Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27510968›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2016

Epb41l5 competes with Delta as a substrate for Mib1 to coordinate specification and differentiation of neurons.

Miho Matsuda, Kinneret Rand, Greg Palardy, Nobuyuki Shimizu, Hiromi Ikeda, Damian Dalle Nogare, Motoyuki Itoh, Ajay B Chitnis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miho MatsudaDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA Section on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA matsudmi@njms.rutgers.edu chitnisa@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-7495-5905
Kinneret RandSection on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Greg PalardySection on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Nobuyuki ShimizuDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Hiromi IkedaSection on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Damian Dalle NogareSection on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Motoyuki ItohSection on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA Department of Pharmacology, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.
Ajay B ChitnisSection on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA matsudmi@njms.rutgers.edu chitnisa@mail.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Cellular, Molecular And Genetic Analysis Of Neural Fate In Zebrafish EmbryosZIAHD001012 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI CHITNIS, AJAY B · 2009 to 2025
$24.8M
CELLULAR, MOLECULAR AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF NEURAL FATE IN ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOSZ01HD001012 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI CHITNIS, AJAY B · 1998 to 2008
$2.1M
Investigation of the role of Mind bomb in epithelial morphogenesisR00HD062561 · NICHD · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MATSUDA, MIHO · 2012 to 2014
$882k
Investigation of the role of Mind bomb in epithelial morphogenesisK99HD062561 · NICHD · U.S. NATIONAL INST/CHILD HLTH/HUMAN DEV · PI MATSUDA, MIHO · 2010 to 2010
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD001012NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD062561NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD062561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We identified Erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 5 (Epb41l5) as a substrate for the E3 ubiquitin ligase Mind bomb 1 (Mib1), which is essential for activation of Notch signaling. Although loss of Epb41l5 does not significantly alter the pattern of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) specified as neurons at the neural plate stage, it delays their delamination and differentiation after neurulation when NPCs normally acquire organized apical junctional complexes (AJCs) in the zebrafish hindbrain. Delays in differentiation are reduced by knocking down N-cadherin, a manipulation expected to help destabilize adherens junctions (AJs). This suggested that delays in neuronal differentiation in epb41l5-deficient embryos are related to a previously described role for Epb41l5 in facilitating disassembly of cadherin-dependent AJCs. Mib1 ubiquitylates Epb41l5 to promote its degradation. DeltaD can compete with Epb41l5 to reduce Mib1-dependent Epb41l5 degradation. In this context, increasing the number of NPCs specified to become neurons, i.e. cells expressing high levels of DeltaD, stabilizes Epb41l5 in the embryo. Together, these observations suggest that relatively high levels of Delta stabilize Epb41l5 in NPCs specified as neurons. This, we suggest, helps coordinate NPC specification with Epb41l5-dependent delamination and differentiation as neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCell LineDogsHEK293 CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunoprecipitationIn Situ HybridizationMembrane ProteinsNeuronsTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesUbiquitin-Protein LigasesZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsMembrane ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesZebrafish ProteinsEpb41l5Epithelial morphogenesisMind bombNeurogenesisNeuronal differentiationNotch signalingZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID27510968
PMCPMC5047669
OpenAlexW2500548423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.