Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27510889›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Etoposide damages female germ cells in the developing ovary.

Agnes Stefansdottir, Zoe C Johnston, Nicola Powles-Glover, Richard A Anderson, Ian R Adams, Norah Spears

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The impact ofHuman reproduction open · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Effects of chemotherapy on ovaries of pregnant mice.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dazl determines primordial follicle formation through the translational regulation of Tex14.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Agnes StefansdottirCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Zoe C JohnstonCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Nicola Powles-GloverAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.
Richard A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Ian R AdamsMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Norah SpearsCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK. norah.spears@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-1974
University of Edinburgh · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Genetics and Cancer · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G1002118Medical Research Council G1100357Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127580973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs with many anti-cancer drugs, the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide is considered safe for administration to women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, but assessment of effects on the developing fetus have been limited. The purpose of this research was to examine the effect of etoposide on germ cells in the developing ovary. Mouse ovary tissue culture was used as the experimental model, thus allowing us to examine effects of etoposide on all stages of germ cell development in the same way, in vitro.

resultsFetal ovaries from embryonic day 13.5 CD1 mice or neonatal ovaries from postnatal day 0 CD1 mice were cultured with 50-150 ng ml(-1) or 50-200 ng ml(-1) etoposide respectively, concentrations that are low relative to that in patient serum. When fetal ovaries were treated prior to follicle formation, etoposide resulted in dose-dependent damage, with 150 ng ml(-1) inducing a near-complete absence of healthy follicles. In contrast, treatment of neonatal ovaries, after follicle formation, had no effect on follicle numbers and only a minor effect on follicle health, even at 200 ng ml(-1). The sensitivity of female germ cells to etoposide coincided with topoisomerase IIα expression: in the developing ovary of both mouse and human, topoisomerase IIα was expressed in germ cells only prior to follicle formation.

conclusionsExposure of pre-follicular ovaries, in which topoisomerase IIα expression was germ cell-specific, resulted in a near-complete elimination of germ cells prior to follicle formation, with the remaining germ cells going on to form unhealthy follicles by the end of culture. In contrast, exposure to follicle-enclosed oocytes, which no longer expressed topoisomerase IIα in the germ cells, had no effect on total follicle numbers or health, the only effect seen specific to transitional follicles. Results indicate the potential for adverse effects on fetal ovarian development if etoposide is administered to pregnant women when germ cells are not yet enclosed within ovarian follicles, a process that starts at approximately 17 weeks gestation and is only complete towards the end of pregnancy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedEtoposideFemaleGerm CellsMiceOocytesOvarian FollicleOvaryAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicEtoposideChemotherapyEtoposideFetal ovaryOocyteOogoniaOvarian follicleTissue culture

Identifiers

PMID27510889
PMCPMC4980800
OpenAlexW2466565742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.