Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27510751›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2016

Prevalence and Predictors of Gastroesophageal Reflux Complications in Community Subjects.

Nicholas R Crews, Michele L Johnson, Cathy D Schleck, Felicity T Enders, Louis-Michel Wongkeesong, Kenneth K Wang, David A Katzka, Prasad G Iyer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Endoscopic Screening of Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Recent Advances in Screening for Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Recent Advances in Non-invasive Esophageal Tissue Sampling.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas R CrewsDivision of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michele L JohnsonBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Cathy D SchleckDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Felicity T EndersDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Louis-Michel WongkeesongBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kenneth K WangBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
David A KatzkaBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Prasad G IyerBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. iyer.prasad@mayo.edu.
WinnMed · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Comparative Effectiveness of endoscopic assessment of GER and BERC4DK090413 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI IYER, PRASAD G. · 2010 to 2012
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NIDDK NIH HHS RC4 DK090413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredictors of erosive esophagitis (EE) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) and the influence of number of risk factors in the community are not well defined.

methodsRates of BE and EE among community residents identified in a randomized screening trial were defined. The risk of EE and BE associated with single and multiple risk factors (gender, age, GERD, Caucasian ethnicity, ever tobacco use, excess alcohol use, family history of BE or EAC, and central obesity) was analyzed.

resultsSixty-eight (33 %) of 205 subjects had EE and/or BE. BE prevalence was 7.8 % with dysplasia present in 1.5 %. Rates were comparable between subjects with and without GERD. Male sex and central obesity were independent risk factors. The odds of EE or BE were 3.7 times higher in subjects with three or four risk factors and 5.7 times higher in subjects with five or more risk factors compared with those with two or less factors.

conclusionsEE and BE are prevalent in the community regardless of the presence of GERD. Risk appeared to be additive, increasing substantially with three or more risk factors.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingBarrett EsophagusEsophagitis, PepticEthnicityFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansIndependent LivingLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesity, AbdominalBarrett’s esophagusEsophageal adenocarcinomaObesityPredictorsRandomized trialScreeningTransnasal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID27510751
PMCPMC5069175
OpenAlexW2493220352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.