Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27510507›Full record

ReviewSports health2016

Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis.

Qi Li, Keiko Amano, Thomas M Link, C Benjamin Ma

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05764603 (Comparison of Conventional MRI,MR Arthrography and MSCT Arthrography in the Detection and Grading of Chondral Lesions of the Osteo Arthritic Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05764603 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Conventional MRI,MR Arthrography and MSCT Arthrography in the Detection and Grading of Chondral Lesions of the Osteo Arthritic Knee

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overused Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty?Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  5. Animal Models of Osteoarthritis: Updated Models and Outcome Measures 2016-2023.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Patient-specific factors are associated with severity of chondrolabral injury in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Applications of PET-MRI in musculoskeletal disease.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018
    Review
  20. Emerging Technologies.Sports health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qi LiWest China Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.
Keiko AmanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Thomas M LinkMusculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
C Benjamin MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California maben@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRadiography is widely accepted as the gold standard for diagnosing osteoarthritis (OA), but it has limitations when assessing early stage OA and monitoring progression. While there are improvements in the treatment of OA, the challenge is early recognition. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE and PubMed as well as professional orthopaedic and imaging websites were reviewed from 2006 to 2016. STUDY

designClinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

resultsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide the most comprehensive assessment of joint injury and OA with the advantages of being noninvasive and multiplanar with excellent soft tissue contrast. However, MRI is expensive, time consuming, and not widely used for monitoring OA clinically. Computed tomography (CT) and CT arthrography (CTA) can also be used to evaluate OA, but these are also invasive and require radiation exposure. Ultrasound is particularly useful for evaluation of synovitis but not for progression of OA.

conclusionMRI, CT, and CTA are available for the diagnosis and monitoring of OA. Improvement in techniques and decrease in cost can allow some of these modalities to be effective methods of detecting early OA.

Indexed as

ArthrographyCartilage, ArticularHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteoarthritisTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographycartilageCTMRIosteoarthritisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID27510507
PMCPMC5010138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.