Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27510304›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Electrical coupling regulates layer 1 interneuron microcircuit formation in the neocortex.

Xing-Hua Yao, Min Wang, Xiang-Nan He, Fei He, Shu-Qing Zhang, Wenlian Lu, Zi-Long Qiu, Yong-Chun Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Direct reprogramming into interneurons: potential for brain repair.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structural and Synaptic Organization of the AdultFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2018
    Article
  20. NeonatalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xing-Hua YaoInstitute of Neurobiology, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Min WangInstitute of Neurobiology, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiang-Nan HeCentre for Computational Systems Biology and the School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Fei HeStem Cell Translational Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Shu-Qing ZhangInstitute of Neurobiology, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wenlian LuCentre for Computational Systems Biology and the School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zi-Long QiuInstitute of Neuroscience and State Key Laboratory of Neuroscience, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yue-Yang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
Yong-Chun YuInstitute of Neurobiology, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Fudan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Medical NeurobiologyTongji University · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coexistence of electrical and chemical synapses among interneurons is essential for interneuron function in the neocortex. However, it remains largely unclear whether electrical coupling between interneurons influences chemical synapse formation and microcircuit assembly during development. Here, we show that electrical and GABAergic chemical connections robustly develop between interneurons in neocortical layer 1 over a similar time course. Electrical coupling promotes action potential generation and synchronous firing between layer 1 interneurons. Furthermore, electrically coupled interneurons exhibit strong GABA-A receptor-mediated synchronous synaptic activity. Disruption of electrical coupling leads to a loss of bidirectional, but not unidirectional, GABAergic connections. Moreover, a reduction in electrical coupling induces an increase in excitatory synaptic inputs to layer 1 interneurons. Together, these findings strongly suggest that electrical coupling between neocortical interneurons plays a critical role in regulating chemical synapse development and precise formation of circuits.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsConnexinsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGap Junction delta-2 ProteinGap JunctionsInterneuronsMiceNeocortexNeural InhibitionReceptors, GABA-ARNA InterferenceSynapsesSynaptic PotentialsConnexinsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGap Junction delta-2 ProteinReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID27510304
PMCPMC4987578
OpenAlexW2516444268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.