ArticleBMC medicine2016
Transforming healthcare through regenerative medicine.
Article in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Encoded Cell-Material Interactions to Reroute Cytokine Signaling for Regenerative Medicine.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Smart hybrid nanomaterials for chronic infections: microbiome-responsive and sustainable therapeutic platforms.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Encoded cell-material interactions to reroute cytokine signaling for regenerative medicine.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Regenerative Medicine and Nanotechnology Approaches against Cardiovascular Diseases: Recent Advances and Future Prospective.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Enhancing Cartilage Repair: Surgical Approaches, Orthobiologics, and the Promise of Exosomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Bone Regeneration Induced by Patient-Adapted Mg Alloy-Based Scaffolds for Bone Defects: Present and Future Perspectives.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In vivo non-invasive monitoring of tissue development in 3D printed subcutaneous bone scaffolds using fibre-optic Raman spectroscopy.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2022Article
- Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery in Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The human arthritic hip joint is a source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) with extensive multipotent differentiation potential.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- Orthopedic Surgeons' Perspectives on the Decision-Making Process for the Use of Bioprinter Cartilage Grafts: Web-Based Survey.Interactive journal of medical research · 2019Article
- Single cell analysis of the inner ear sensory organs.The International journal of developmental biology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Regenerative medicine therapies, underpinned by the core principles of rejuvenation, regeneration and replacement, are shifting the paradigm in healthcare from symptomatic treatment in the 20th century to curative treatment in the 21st century. By addressing the reasons behind the rapid expansion of regenerative medicine research and presenting an overview of current clinical trials, we explore the potential of regenerative medicine to reshape modern healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.