Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2016
Consistency of Hemoglobin A1c Testing and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Medicare Patients With Diabetes.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Enhancing pharmacist intervention targeting based on patient clustering with unsupervised machine learning.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2025Article
- Applying National Diabetic Care Standards for the Management of a Hispanic Population Attending a Free Clinic.Journal of community health · 2023Article
- Diabetic Kidney Disease Is Associated With Increased Complications Following Operative Management of Ankle Fractures.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Diabetes Mellitus and Tinnitus: an Epidemiology Study.Maedica · 2021Article
- Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes: current challenges and opportunities.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2020Review
- Annual wellness visits are associated with increased use of preventive services in patients with diabetes living in the Diabetes Belt.Diabetes epidemiology and managementArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnnual hemoglobin A1c testing is recommended for patients with diabetes mellitus. However, it is unknown how consistently patients with diabetes mellitus receive hemoglobin A1c testing over time, or whether testing consistency is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND
resultsWe identified 1 574 415 Medicare patients (2002-2012) with diabetes mellitus over the age of 65. We followed each patient for a minimum of 3 years to determine their consistency in hemoglobin A1C testing, using 3 categories: low (testing in 0 or 1 of 3 years), medium (testing in 2 of 3 years), and high (testing in all 3 years). In unweighted and inverse propensity-weighted cohorts, we examined associations between testing consistency and major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation, or the need for leg revascularization. Overall, 70.2% of patients received high-consistency testing, 17.6% of patients received medium-consistency testing, and 12.2% of patients received low-consistency testing. When compared to high-consistency testing, low-consistency testing was associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events or death in unweighted analyses (hazard ratio [HR]=1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.23; P<0.001), inverse propensity-weighted analyses (HR=1.16; 95% CI, 1.15-1.17; P<0.001), and weighted analyses limited to patients who had at least 4 physician visits annually (HR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.15-1.16; P<0.001). Less-consistent testing was associated with worse results for each cardiovascular outcome and in analyses using all years as the exposure.
conclusionsConsistent annual hemoglobin A1c testing is associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this observational cohort of Medicare patients of diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.