Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27509876›Full record

Trial reportTropical animal health and production2016

Influence of sustained deworming pressure on the anthelmintic resistance status in strongyles of sheep under field conditions.

M K Vijayasarathi, C Sreekumar, R Venkataramanan, M Raman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tropical animal health and production, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M K VijayasarathiMadras Veterinary College (TANUVAS), Vepery, Chennai, 600 007, Tamil Nadu, India. sarathivet@gmail.com.
C SreekumarPostgraduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences, Kattupakkam, Kanchipuram, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India.
R VenkataramananPostgraduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences, Kattupakkam, Kanchipuram, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India.
M RamanTranslational Research Platform for Veterinary Biologicals, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai, 600 051, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INTranslational Research Platform for Veterinary Biologicals (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthelmintic resistance (AR) status in Madras Red sheep from selected field flocks of a government funded scheme, covered by regular, sustained anthelmintic treatment for more than 10 years was determined. Parameters such as fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT), larval paralysis assay (LPA), and allele-specific-PCR (AS-PCR) were used to test the efficacy of fenbendazole, tetramisole, and ivermectin at recommended doses, in two seasons. Sheep belonging to non-beneficiary farmers were used as controls. Mean FECRT values of beneficiary group during winter and summer seasons were 77.77 and 76.04, 93.65 and 92.12, and 95.37 and 98.06 %, respectively, for fenbendazole, tetramisole, and ivermectin. In the non-beneficiary groups, the corresponding values were 74.82 and 81.09 %, 96.05 and 97.40 %, and 97.26 and 98.23 %, respectively. The results revealed resistance to fenbendazole, suspect resistance to tetramisole and susceptibility to ivermectin in beneficiary flock. In non-beneficiary flock, while resistance was noticed against fenbendazole, both tetramisole and ivermectin were effective. FECR values were found to be significantly different between beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups against tetramisole. The results of LPA confirmed this finding, as 50 % of the Haemonchus contortus larvae were paralyzed at the concentration of 0.0156 μg/ml in the beneficiary group, while those of non-beneficiary groups required lower concentrations of 0.0078 μg/ml. AS-PCR revealed the predominance of heterozygous susceptible population of H. contortus in the beneficiary group. In this study, resistance to fenbendazole was confirmed in both the beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups and this could be attributed to frequent use of benzimidazoles as seen from the deworming records. Emergence of tetramisole resistance was detected in the beneficiary group, where the drug was used continuously for 4 years. Ivermectin was found to be effective in all the flocks. It is recommended that the practice of routine deworming of three to four times a year should be avoided, as it can lead to emergence of anthelmintic resistance.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnthelminticsDrug Administration ScheduleFecesFenbendazoleHaemonchiasisHaemonchusIndiaIvermectinParasite Egg CountSheepSheep DiseasesTetramisoleTropical ClimateAnthelminticsFenbendazoleIvermectinTetramisoleAnthelmintic resistanceHaemonchus contortusSheepStrongylesSustained deworming

Identifiers

PMID27509876
OpenAlexW2513516095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.