Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27509843›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Stratification of responders towards eculizumab using a structural epitope mapping strategy.

Anna-Luisa Volk, Francis Jingxin Hu, Magnus M Berglund, Erik Nordling, Patrik Strömberg, Mathias Uhlen, Johan Rockberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Overview of Epitopes and Methods for Antibody Epitope Mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inflammation, immunity and potential target therapy of SARS-COV-2: A total scale analysis review.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna-Luisa VolkKTH - Royal Institute of Technology, School of Biotechnology, Department of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Francis Jingxin HuKTH - Royal Institute of Technology, School of Biotechnology, Department of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus M BerglundSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, 11276 Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik NordlingSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, 11276 Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrik StrömbergSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, 11276 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mathias UhlenKTH - Royal Institute of Technology, School of Biotechnology, Department of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan RockbergKTH - Royal Institute of Technology, School of Biotechnology, Department of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SESwedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complement component 5 (C5)-binding antibody eculizumab is used to treat patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). As recently reported there is a need for a precise classification of eculizumab responsive patients to allow for a safe and cost-effective treatment. To allow for such stratification, knowledge of the precise binding site of the drug on its target is crucial. Using a structural epitope mapping strategy based on bacterial surface display, flow cytometric sorting and validation via haemolytic activity testing, we identified six residues essential for binding of eculizumab to C5. This epitope co-localizes with the contact area recently identified by crystallography and includes positions in C5 mutated in non-responders. The identified epitope also includes residue W917, which is unique for human C5 and explains the observed lack of cross-reactivity for eculizumab with other primates. We could demonstrate that Ornithodorus moubata complement inhibitor (OmCI), in contrast to eculizumab, maintained anti-haemolytic function for mutations in any of the six epitope residues, thus representing a possible alternative treatment for patients non-responsive to eculizumab. The method for stratification of patients described here allows for precision medicine and should be applicable to several other diseases and therapeutics.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBinding SitesCHO CellsComplement C5Complement Inactivating AgentsCricetulusCrystallography, X-RayEpitope MappingHumansModels, MolecularMutationProtein DomainsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement C5Complement Inactivating Agentseculizumab

Identifiers

PMID27509843
PMCPMC4980765
OpenAlexW2512730716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.