Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27509297›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Women's Careers in Biomedical Sciences: Implications for the Economy, Scientific Discovery, and Women's Health.

Jennifer L Plank-Bazinet, Misty L Heggeness, P Kay Lund, Janine Austin Clayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Advancing gender equity in medicine.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. NIH funding longevity by gender.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer L Plank-Bazinet1 Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Misty L Heggeness2 Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division, US Census Bureau , Suitland, Maryland.
P Kay Lund3 Division of Biomedical Research Workforce, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Janine Austin Clayton1 Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While women have been well represented in medical school and biomedical doctoral degree programs, they do not comprise half of academic medicine faculty positions. Furthermore, there is a significant paucity of women in academic medicine leadership positions, as evidenced by the fact that only 16% of dean positions at United States Medical schools are filled by women. In this commentary, the authors review the state of women in academic medicine and argue that increased representation of women in the academic workforce will lead to economic gains, increased scientific discovery, and improvements to women's health.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCareer MobilityPhysicians, WomenScienceWomen's HealthAcademic Medical CentersFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansLeadershipSchools, MedicalSexismWorkforceacademic medicinebiomedical research workforcecareersgender and economic developmentscientific discoverywomen in sciencewomen's health

Identifiers

PMID27509297
PMCPMC5446606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.