Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27509260›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Everolimus affects vasculogenic mimicry in renal carcinoma resistant to sunitinib.

Maria Serova, Annemilaï Tijeras-Raballand, Celia Dos Santos, Matthieu Martinet, Cindy Neuzillet, Alfred Lopez, Dianne C Mitchell, Brad A Bryan, Guillaume Gapihan, Anne Janin and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Tumor angiogenesis: causes, consequences, challenges and opportunities.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  14. Extracellular Vesicles Are Key Regulators of Tumor Neovasculature.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria SerovaAAREC Filia Research, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Annemilaï Tijeras-RaballandAAREC Filia Research, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Celia Dos SantosAAREC Filia Research, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Matthieu MartinetAAREC Filia Research, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Cindy NeuzilletDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), Clichy, France.
Alfred LopezDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Center of Emphasis in Cancer Research at the Paul Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Dianne C MitchellDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Center of Emphasis in Cancer Research at the Paul Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Brad A BryanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Center of Emphasis in Cancer Research at the Paul Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Guillaume GapihanINSERM, Paris France.
Anne JaninINSERM, Paris France.
Guilhem BousquetDepartment of Pathology Saint Louis University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), Paris France.
Maria Eugenia RiveiroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), Clichy, France.
Ivan BiecheLaboratory of Oncogenetics, Institut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, St-Cloud, France.
Sandrine FaivreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), Clichy, France.
Eric RaymondDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), Clichy, France.
Armand de GramontAAREC Filia Research, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRFidal · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRTexas Tech University · USAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital René Huguenin · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is hallmark of clear cell renal cell carcinogenesis. Anti-angiogenic therapies have been successful in improving disease outcome; however, most patients treated with anti-angiogenic agents will eventually progress. In this study we report that clear cell renal cell carcinoma was associated with vasculogenic mimicry in both mice and human with tumor cells expressing endothelial markers in the vicinity of tumor vessels. We show that vasculogenic mimicry was efficiently targeted by sunitinib but eventually associated with tumor resistance and a more aggressive phenotype both in vitro and in vivo. Re-challenging these resistant tumors in mice, we showed that second-line treatment with everolimus particularly affected vasculogenic mimicry and tumor cell differentiation compared to sorafenib and axitinib. Finally, our results highlighted the phenotypic and genotypic changes at the tumor cell and microenvironment levels during sunitinib response and progression and the subsequent improvement second-line therapies bring to the current renal cell carcinoma treatment paradigm.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAxitinibCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEverolimusFemaleHumansImidazolesIndazolesIndolesKidney NeoplasmsMiceMice, NudeAngiogenesis InhibitorsAxitinibEverolimusImidazolesIndazolesIndolesPyrrolesSunitinibangiogenesisdifferentiationeverolimusrenal cell carcinomasunitinib

Identifiers

PMID27509260
PMCPMC5122404
OpenAlexW2408504246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.