Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27509077›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Economic Analysis of the Impact of Overseas and Domestic Treatment and Screening Options for Intestinal Helminth Infection among US-Bound Refugees from Asia.

Brian Maskery, Margaret S Coleman, Michelle Weinberg, Weigong Zhou, Lisa Rotz, Alexander Klosovsky, Paul T Cantey, LeAnne M Fox, Martin S Cetron, William M Stauffer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ChronicJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Strongyloidiasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Disease Surveillance Among U.S.-Bound Immigrants and Refugees - Electronic Disease Notification System, United States, 2014-2019.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2022
    Article
  6. Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites in a Low-Income Texas Community.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. High Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Infectious Diseases among Refugee Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Case Report:The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Comments to the documentEnfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian MaskeryDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Margaret S ColemanDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Michelle WeinbergDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Weigong ZhouDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Lisa RotzDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Alexander KlosovskyInternational Organization for Migration, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Paul T CanteyDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
LeAnne M FoxDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Martin S CetronDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
William M StaufferDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria · USMigration Policy Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany U.S.-bound refugees travel from countries where intestinal parasites (hookworm, Trichuris trichuria, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Strongyloides stercoralis) are endemic. These infections are rare in the United States and may be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed, leading to potentially serious consequences. This evaluation examined the costs and benefits of combinations of overseas presumptive treatment of parasitic diseases vs. domestic screening/treating vs. no program.

methodsAn economic decision tree model terminating in Markov processes was developed to estimate the cost and health impacts of four interventions on an annual cohort of 27,700 U.S.-bound Asian refugees: 1) "No Program," 2) U.S. "Domestic Screening and Treatment," 3) "Overseas Albendazole and Ivermectin" presumptive treatment, and 4) "Overseas Albendazole and Domestic Screening for Strongyloides". Markov transition state models were used to estimate long-term effects of parasitic infections. Health outcome measures (four parasites) included outpatient cases, hospitalizations, deaths, life years, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

resultsThe "No Program" option is the least expensive ($165,923 per cohort) and least effective option (145 outpatient cases, 4.0 hospitalizations, and 0.67 deaths discounted over a 60-year period for a one-year cohort). The "Overseas Albendazole and Ivermectin" option ($418,824) is less expensive than "Domestic Screening and Treatment" ($3,832,572) or "Overseas Albendazole and Domestic Screening for Strongyloides" ($2,182,483). According to the model outcomes, the most effective treatment option is "Overseas Albendazole and Ivermectin," which reduces outpatient cases, deaths and hospitalization by around 80% at an estimated net cost of $458,718 per death averted, or $2,219/$24,036 per QALY/life year gained relative to "No Program". DISCUSSION: Overseas presumptive treatment for U.S.-bound refugees is a cost-effective intervention that is less expensive and at least as effective as domestic screening and treatment programs. The addition of ivermectin to albendazole reduces the prevalence of chronic strongyloidiasis and the probability of rare, but potentially fatal, disseminated strongyloidiasis.

Indexed as

RefugeesAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAscariasisAscaris lumbricoidesAsiaCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Medical InterventionHelminthiasisHookworm InfectionsHospitalizationHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMass ScreeningModels, EconomicPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID27509077
PMCPMC4980012
OpenAlexW2490076904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.