Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27508388›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Protein Profiles for Muscle Development and Intramuscular Fat Accumulation at Different Post-Hatching Ages in Chickens.

Jie Liu, Ruiqi Fu, Ranran Liu, Guiping Zhao, Maiqing Zheng, Huanxian Cui, Qinghe Li, Jiao Song, Jie Wang, Jie Wen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Polymorphism of Genes and Their Impact on Beef Quality.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Missense Mutation in theFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Ruiqi FuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Ranran LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Guiping ZhaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Maiqing ZhengInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Huanxian CuiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Qinghe LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Jiao SongInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Jie WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Jie WenInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P. R. China.
Institute of Animal Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle development and growth influences the efficiency of poultry meat production, and is closely related to deposition of intramuscular fat (IMF), which is crucial in meat quality. To clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying muscle development and IMF deposition in chickens, protein expression profiles were examined in the breast muscle of Beijing-You chickens at ages 1, 56, 98 and 140 days, using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ). Two hundred and four of 494 proteins were expressed differentially. The expression profile at day 1 differed greatly from those at day 56, 98 and 140. KEGG pathway analysis of differential protein expression from pair-wise comparisons (day 1 vs. 56; 56 vs. 98; 98 vs. 140), showed that the fatty acid degradation pathway was more active during the stage from day 1 to 56 than at other periods. This was consistent with the change in IMF content, which was highest at day 1 and declined dramatically thereafter. When muscle growth was most rapid (days 56-98), pathways involved in muscle development were dominant, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac muscle contraction, tight junctions and focal adhesion. In contrast with hatchlings, the fatty acid degradation pathway was downregulated from day 98 to 140, which was consistent with the period for IMF deposition following rapid muscle growth. Changes in some key specific proteins, including fast skeletal muscle troponin T isoform, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 and apolipoprotein A1, were verified by Western blotting, and could be potential biomarkers for IMF deposition in chickens. Protein-protein interaction networks showed that ribosome-related functional modules were clustered in all three stages. However, the functional module involved in the metabolic pathway was only clustered in the first stage (day 1 vs. 56). This study improves our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying muscle development and IMF deposition in chickens.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAdipose TissueAge FactorsAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyAnimalsApolipoprotein A-IBlotting, WesternChickensDown-RegulationFatty AcidsIsoenzymesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMuscle, SkeletalProtein Interaction MapsProteomeRetinal DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyApolipoprotein A-IFatty AcidsIsoenzymesProteomeRetinal DehydrogenaseTroponin T

Identifiers

PMID27508388
PMCPMC4980056
OpenAlexW2494936367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.