Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27508384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Integration of Serum Protein Biomarker and Tumor Associated Autoantibody Expression Data Increases the Ability of a Blood-Based Proteomic Assay to Identify Breast Cancer.

Meredith C Henderson, Alan B Hollingsworth, Kelly Gordon, Michael Silver, Rao Mulpuri, Elias Letsios, David E Reese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Autoantibodies in Early Detection of Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. AAgAtlas 1.0: a human autoantigen database.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meredith C HendersonProvista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-6040
Alan B HollingsworthMercy Women's Center-Oklahoma City, 4300 McAuley Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America, 73120-8302.
Kelly GordonProvista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.
Michael SilverProvista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.
Rao MulpuriProvista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.
Elias LetsiosProvista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.
David E ReeseProvista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.
Mercy Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in breast imaging, the ability to accurately detect Breast Cancer (BC) remains a challenge. With the discovery of key biomarkers and protein signatures for BC, proteomic technologies are currently poised to serve as an ideal diagnostic adjunct to imaging. Research studies have shown that breast tumors are associated with systemic changes in levels of both serum protein biomarkers (SPB) and tumor associated autoantibodies (TAAb). However, the independent contribution of SPB and TAAb expression data for identifying BC relative to a combinatorial SPB and TAAb approach has not been fully investigated. This study evaluates these contributions using a retrospective cohort of pre-biopsy serum samples with known clinical outcomes collected from a single site, thus minimizing potential site-to-site variation and enabling direct assessment of SPB and TAAb contributions to identify BC. All serum samples (n = 210) were collected prior to biopsy. These specimens were obtained from 18 participants with no evidence of breast disease (ND), 92 participants diagnosed with Benign Breast Disease (BBD) and 100 participants diagnosed with BC, including DCIS. All BBD and BC diagnoses were based on pathology results from biopsy. Statistical models were developed to differentiate BC from non-BC (i.e., BBD and ND) using expression data from SPB alone, TAAb alone, and a combination of SPB and TAAb. When SPB data was independently used for modeling, clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC were 74.7% and 77.0%, respectively. When TAAb data was independently used, clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC were 72.2% and 70.8%, respectively. When modeling integrated data from both SPB and TAAb, the clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC improved to 81.0% and 78.8%, respectively. These data demonstrate the benefit of the integration of SPB and TAAb data and strongly support the further development of combinatorial proteomic approaches for detecting BC.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMultivariate AnalysisProteomicsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27508384
PMCPMC4980010
OpenAlexW2489642074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.