ArticlePloS one2016
Integration of Serum Protein Biomarker and Tumor Associated Autoantibody Expression Data Increases the Ability of a Blood-Based Proteomic Assay to Identify Breast Cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomics in Diagnostic Evaluation and Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Sensors Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in the Field of Cancer Biomarker Detection: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- High-throughput and multi-phases identification of autoantibodies in diagnosing early-stage breast cancer and subtypes.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Autoantibodies as biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Detection of leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 containing immunocomplexes in the plasma of lung cancer patients with epitope-specific mAbs.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022Article
- AKR1B10 as a Potential Novel Serum Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Recent Discoveries of Macromolecule- and Cell-Based Biomarkers and Therapeutic Implications in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Autoantibodies in Early Detection of Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Article
- Review
- Challenges and Opportunities in Clinical Applications of Blood-Based Proteomics in Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
- Why the Gold Standard Approach by Mammography Demands Extension by Multiomics? Application of Liquid Biopsy miRNA Profiles to Breast Cancer Disease Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- A Combinatorial Proteomic Biomarker Assay to Detect Ovarian Cancer in Women.Biomarkers in cancer · 2018Article
- AAgAtlas 1.0: a human autoantigen database.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Multiplexed Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays.Theranostics · 2017Article
- Mass spectrometry-assisted gel-based proteomics in cancer biomarker discovery: approaches and application.Theranostics · 2017Review
- Identification of potential serum biomarkers for breast cancer using a functional proteomics technology.Biomarker research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advances in breast imaging, the ability to accurately detect Breast Cancer (BC) remains a challenge. With the discovery of key biomarkers and protein signatures for BC, proteomic technologies are currently poised to serve as an ideal diagnostic adjunct to imaging. Research studies have shown that breast tumors are associated with systemic changes in levels of both serum protein biomarkers (SPB) and tumor associated autoantibodies (TAAb). However, the independent contribution of SPB and TAAb expression data for identifying BC relative to a combinatorial SPB and TAAb approach has not been fully investigated. This study evaluates these contributions using a retrospective cohort of pre-biopsy serum samples with known clinical outcomes collected from a single site, thus minimizing potential site-to-site variation and enabling direct assessment of SPB and TAAb contributions to identify BC. All serum samples (n = 210) were collected prior to biopsy. These specimens were obtained from 18 participants with no evidence of breast disease (ND), 92 participants diagnosed with Benign Breast Disease (BBD) and 100 participants diagnosed with BC, including DCIS. All BBD and BC diagnoses were based on pathology results from biopsy. Statistical models were developed to differentiate BC from non-BC (i.e., BBD and ND) using expression data from SPB alone, TAAb alone, and a combination of SPB and TAAb. When SPB data was independently used for modeling, clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC were 74.7% and 77.0%, respectively. When TAAb data was independently used, clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC were 72.2% and 70.8%, respectively. When modeling integrated data from both SPB and TAAb, the clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC improved to 81.0% and 78.8%, respectively. These data demonstrate the benefit of the integration of SPB and TAAb data and strongly support the further development of combinatorial proteomic approaches for detecting BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.