Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27508341›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017

The Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh): Driving Innovation in Translational Research Through an Incentive-Based, Problem-Focused Competition.

Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick, John Maier, Laurel Yasko, David Mathias, Kacy Qua, Erika Wagner, Elizabeth Miller, Steven E Reis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole Edgar FitzpatrickN.E. Fitzpatrick is innovation project manager, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. J. Maier is assistant professor of family medicine and clinical and translational science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. L. Yasko is administrative director of operations, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. D. Mathias is administrative director of finance, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. K. Qua is founder and chief executive officer, Qualifyor, Las Vegas, Nevada. E. Wagner is business development manager, Blue Origin, Kent, Washington. E. Miller is professor of pediatrics and clinical and translational science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. S.E. Reis is associate vice chancellor for clinical research, health sciences, and professor of medicine and clinical and translational science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John Maier
Laurel Yasko
David Mathias
Kacy Qua
Erika Wagner
Elizabeth Miller
Steven E Reis

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemTranslational research aims to move scientific discoveries across the biomedical spectrum from the laboratory to humans, and to ultimately transform clinical practice and public health policies. Despite efforts to accelerate translational research through national initiatives, several major hurdles remain. APPROACH: The authors created the Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh) as an incentive-based, problem-focused approach to solving identified clinical or public health problems at the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute in spring 2014. With input from a broad range of stakeholders, PInCh leadership arrived at the challenge question: How do we empower individuals to take control of their own health outcomes? The authors developed the PInCh's three-round proposal submission and review process as well as an online contest management tool to support the process. OUTCOMES: Ninety-two teams submitted video proposals in round one. Proposals included mobile applications (29; 32%), other information technology (19; 21%), and community program (22; 24%) solutions. Ten teams advanced to the final round, where three were awarded $100,000 to implement their solution over 12 months. In a 6-month follow-up survey, 6/11 (55%) team leaders stated the PInCh helped to facilitate connections outside their normal sphere of collaborators. NEXT STEPS: Additional educational training sessions related to problem-focused research will be developed. The PInCh will be expanded to engage investment and industry communities to facilitate the translation of solutions to clinical practice via commercialization pathways. External organizations and other universities will be engaged to use the PInCh as a mechanism to fuel innovation in their spaces.

Indexed as

Awards and PrizesInventionsMotivationProblem SolvingTranslational Research, BiomedicalUniversitiesHumansLeadershipPennsylvania

Identifiers

PMID27508341
PMCPMC5400731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.