Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27508260›Full record

ArticleData in brief2016

Data and programs in support of network analysis of genes and their association with diseases.

Panagiota I Kontou, Athanasia Pavlopoulou, Niki L Dimou, Georgios A Pavlopoulos, Pantelis G Bagos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Panagiota I KontouDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece.
Athanasia PavlopoulouDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece.
Niki L DimouDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece.
Georgios A PavlopoulosLawrence Berkeley Lab, Joint Genome Institute, United States Department of Energy, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Pantelis G BagosDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The network-based approaches that were employed in order to depict the relationships between human genetic diseases and their associated genes are described. Towards this direction, monopartite disease-disease and gene-gene networks were constructed from bipartite gene-disease association networks. The latter were created by collecting and integrating data from three diverse resources, each one with different content, covering from rare monogenic disorders to common complex diseases. Moreover, topological and clustering graph analyses were performed. The methodology and the programs presented in this article are related to the research article entitled "Network analysis of genes and their association with diseases" [1].

Indexed as

Disease-disease networksGene-disease associationsGene-gene networks

Identifiers

PMID27508260
PMCPMC4969244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.