Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27508120›Full record

ArticleGenomics data2016

Characterization of the replication timing program of 6 human model cell lines.

Djihad Hadjadj, Thomas Denecker, Chrystelle Maric, Fabien Fauchereau, Giuseppe Baldacci, Jean-Charles Cadoret

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics data, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Omics Analyses: How to Navigate Through a Constant Data Deluge.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Djihad HadjadjInstitut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, CNRS, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 15 Rue Hélène Brion, Paris Cedex 13 75205, France.
Thomas DeneckerInstitut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, CNRS, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 15 Rue Hélène Brion, Paris Cedex 13 75205, France.
Chrystelle MaricInstitut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, CNRS, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 15 Rue Hélène Brion, Paris Cedex 13 75205, France.
Fabien FauchereauInstitut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, CNRS, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 15 Rue Hélène Brion, Paris Cedex 13 75205, France.
Giuseppe BaldacciInstitut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, CNRS, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 15 Rue Hélène Brion, Paris Cedex 13 75205, France.
Jean-Charles CadoretInstitut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, CNRS, University Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 15 Rue Hélène Brion, Paris Cedex 13 75205, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the S-phase, the DNA replication process is finely orchestrated and regulated by two programs: the spatial program that determines where replication will start in the genome (Cadoret et al. (2008 Oct 14), Cayrou et al. (2011 Sep), Picard et al. (2014 May 1) [1], [2], [3]), and the temporal program that determines when during the S phase different parts of the genome are replicated and when origins are activated. The temporal program is so well conserved for each cell type from independent individuals [4] that it is possible to identify a cell type from an unknown sample just by determining its replication timing program. Moreover, replicative domains are strongly correlated with the partition of the genome into topological domains (determined by the Hi-C method, Lieberman-Aiden et al. (2009 Oct 9), Pope et al. (2014 Nov 20) [5], [6]). On the one hand, replicative areas are well defined and participate in shaping the spatial organization of the genome for a given cell type. On the other hand, studies on the timing program during cell differentiation showed a certain plasticity of this program according to the stage of cell differentiation Hiratani et al. (2008 Oct 7, 2010 Feb) [7], [8]. Domains where a replication timing change was observed went through a nuclear re-localization. Thus the temporal program of replication can be considered as an epigenetic mark Hiratani and Gilbert (2009 Feb 16) [9]. We present the genomic data of replication timing in 6 human model cell lines: U2OS (GSM2111308), RKO (GSM2111309), HEK 293T (GSM2111310), HeLa (GSM2111311), MRC5-SV (GSM2111312) and K562 (GSM2111313). A short comparative analysis was performed that allowed us to define regions common to the 6 cell lines. These replication timing data can be taken into account when performing studies that use these model cell lines.

Indexed as

DNA replication timingHEK 293THeLaK562MRC5RKOU2OS

Identifiers

PMID27508120
PMCPMC4961496
OpenAlexW2489909830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.