ArticleFrontiers in zoology2016
Passive acoustic monitoring reveals group ranging and territory use: a case study of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Audio Detection Networks From Passive Acoustic Monitoring of a Critically Endangered Primate.Integrative zoology · 2026Article
- Video-Sound Recording Devices Reveal Multiple Drivers of Nocturnal Vocalizations in Tibetan Macaques.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Automatic detection for bioacoustic research: a practical guide from and for biologists and computer scientists.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Who is calling? Optimizing source identification from marmoset vocalizations with hierarchical machine learning classifiers.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Automated acoustic detection of Geoffroy's spider monkey highlights tipping points of human disturbance.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Listening to Their Nights: Sleep Disruptions in Captive Housed Chimpanzees Affect Their Daytime Behavior.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Passive acoustic monitoring for detecting the Yellow-bellied Glider, a highly vocal arboreal marsupial.PloS one · 2021Article
- Assessment of in situ nest decay rate for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes ellioti Matschie, 1914) in Mbam-Djerem National Park, Cameroon: implications for long-term monitoring.Primates; journal of primatology · 2020Article
- Gibbons aren't singing in the rain: presence and amount of rainfall influences ape calling behavior in Sabah, Malaysia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- What animals do not do or fail to find: A novel observational approach for studying cognition in the wild.Evolutionary anthropology · 2019Review
- Chimpanzee quiet hoo variants differ according to context.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Acoustic localization at large scales: a promising method for grey wolf monitoring.Frontiers in zoology · 2018Article
- Non-dietary analytical features of chimpanzee scats.Primates; journal of primatology · 2017Article
- Variation in hunting behaviour in neighbouring chimpanzee communities in the Budongo forest, Uganda.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing the range and territories of wild mammals traditionally requires years of data collection and often involves directly following individuals or using tracking devices. Indirect and non-invasive methods of monitoring wildlife have therefore emerged as attractive alternatives due to their ability to collect data at large spatiotemporal scales using standardized remote sensing technologies. Here, we investigate the use of two novel passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) systems used to capture long-distance sounds produced by the same species, wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), living in two different habitats: forest (Taï, Côte d'Ivoire) and savanna-woodland (Issa valley, Tanzania).
resultsUsing data collected independently at two field sites, we show that detections of chimpanzee sounds on autonomous recording devices were predicted by direct and indirect indices of chimpanzee presence. At Taï, the number of chimpanzee buttress drums detected on recording devices was positively influenced by the number of hours chimpanzees were seen ranging within a 1 km radius of a device. We observed a similar but weaker relationship within a 500 m radius. At Issa, the number of indirect chimpanzee observations positively predicted detections of chimpanzee loud calls on a recording device within a 500 m but not a 1 km radius. Moreover, using just seven months of PAM data, we could locate two known chimpanzee communities in Taï and observed monthly spatial variation in the center of activity for each group.
conclusionsOur work shows PAM is a promising new tool for gathering information about the ranging behavior and habitat use of chimpanzees and can be easily adopted for other large territorial mammals, provided they produce long-distance acoustic signals that can be captured by autonomous recording devices (e.g., lions and wolves). With this study we hope to promote more interdisciplinary research in PAM to help overcome its challenges, particularly in data processing, to improve its wider application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.