Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27507938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2016

The Pointing Errors in Optic Ataxia Reveal the Role of "Peripheral Magnification" of the PPC.

Philippe Vindras, Annabelle Blangero, Hisaaki Ota, Karen T Reilly, Yves Rossetti, Laure Pisella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pointing in cervical dystonia patients.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philippe VindrasImpAct Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292 and University Claude Bernard Lyon I Villeurbanne, France.
Annabelle BlangeroDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Hisaaki OtaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University Sapporo, Japan.
Karen T ReillyImpAct Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292 and University Claude Bernard Lyon I Villeurbanne, France.
Yves RossettiImpAct Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292 and University Claude Bernard Lyon I Villeurbanne, France.
Laure PisellaImpAct Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292 and University Claude Bernard Lyon I Villeurbanne, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction with visual objects in the environment requires an accurate correspondence between visual space and its internal representation within the brain. Many clinical conditions involve some impairment in visuo-motor control and the errors created by the lesion of a specific brain region are neither random nor uninformative. Modern approaches to studying the neuropsychology of action require powerful data-driven analyses and error modeling in order to understand the function of the lesioned areas. In the present paper we carried out mixed-effect analyses of the pointing errors of seven optic ataxia patients and seven control subjects. We found that a small parameter set is sufficient to explain the pointing errors produced by unilateral optic ataxia patients. In particular, the extremely stereotypical errors made when pointing toward the contralesional visual field can be fitted by mathematical models similar to those used to model central magnification in cortical or sub-cortical structure(s). Our interpretation is that visual areas that contain this footprint of central magnification guide pointing movements when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is damaged and that the functional role of the PPC is to actively compensate for the under-representation of peripheral vision that accompanies central magnification. Optic ataxia misreaching reveals what would be hand movement accuracy and precision if the human motor system did not include elaborated corrective processes for reaching and grasping to non-foveated targets.

Indexed as

mathematical modelingmodelsoptic ataxiaperipheral visionposterior parietal cortextheoreticalvisual central magnificationvisuo-motor control

Identifiers

PMID27507938
PMCPMC4960242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.