Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016
Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib With and Without Pemetrexed as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.
Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05132985 (Neoadjuvant Icotinib With Chemotherapy for Resectable Stage II-IIIB N2 EGFR Mutation-positive Lung Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neoadjuvant Icotinib With Chemotherapy for Resectable Stage II-IIIB N2 EGFR Mutation-positive Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Study
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC in diverse clinicopathological subgroups: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative analysis of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- What is the optimal first-line regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Genetic Variants in theGenes · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone for advanced non‑small‑cell lung cancer: A meta analysis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- An updated network meta-analysis of EGFR-TKIs and combination therapy in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- First-Generation EGFR-TKI Plus Chemotherapy Versus EGFR-TKI Alone as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Activating Mutation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of first line treatments for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated, non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- Gefitinib provides similar effectiveness and improved safety than erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analysis of First-Line Osimertinib Plus Chemotherapy in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Trial
- EGFR-TKI Combined with Pemetrexed versus EGFR-TKI Monotherapy in Advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A Prospective, Randomized, Exploratory Study.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Trial
- Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913.Investigational new drugs · 2021Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of First-Generation EGFR-TKIs Combined with Chemotherapy for Treatment-Naïve Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring SensitiveJournal of inflammation research · 2021Trial
- Adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in resected stage N2 non-small cell lung cancer harboringTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether the addition of pemetrexed to gefitinib (P+G) provides clinical benefit, compared with gefitinib monotherapy, in patients with advanced nonsquamous (NS) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. PATIENTS AND
methodsChemotherapy-naïve for advanced NSCLC patients from China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan (35 sites) with advanced, EGFR-mutant, NS NSCLC were randomly assigned (2:1; computer-generated, interactive voice response) to open-label pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of every 21-day cycle) plus gefitinib (250 mg/d [n = 129]) or gefitinib alone (n = 66). The primary end point was progression-free-survival (PFS); secondary end points were time to progressive disease, overall survival, tumor response rates, duration of response, and safety. All end points were assessed in the intent-to-treat and safety population (P+G, n = 126; gefitinib alone, n = 65).
resultsPFS was significantly longer with P+G (median, 15.8 months; 95% CI, 12.6 to 18.3 months) than with gefitinib (median, 10.9 months; 95% CI, 9.7 to 13.8 months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96; one-sided P = .014; two-sided P = .029). Results of EGFR exon 19 deletion and EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation subgroup analyses were consistent with the intent-to-treat result. P+G, compared with gefitinib alone, resulted in significantly longer time to progressive disease (median, 16.2 v 10.9 months, respectively; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.93) and numerically longer duration of response (median, 15.4 v 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.08). Tumor response rates did not differ. Overall survival data are immature. Drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common with P+G, but toxicities were manageable.
conclusionP+G improved PFS compared with gefitinib alone in East Asian patients with advanced NS NSCLC and activating EGFR mutations. This combination may offer EGFR mutation-positive patients new treatment options and improved clinical outcomes compared with the current standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.