Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27507615›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Characterization of cancer stem cells from different grades of human colorectal cancer.

J Manhas, A Bhattacharya, S K Agrawal, B Gupta, P Das, S V S Deo, S Pal, S Sen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional assessment of miR‑1291 in colon cancer cells.International journal of oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Gene: X · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J ManhasDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
A BhattacharyaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
S K AgrawalDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
B GuptaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
P DasDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
S V S DeoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
S PalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
S SenDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. sudipsen99@rediffmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common solid tumors worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that a population of cancer cells, called cancer stem cells (CSCs), is responsible for tumor heterogeneity, invasion, metastasis, therapeutic resistance, and recurrence of CRC. The isolation and characterization of CSCs using cell surface markers have been reported previously with varying results. In this study, we investigated a panel of four putative CSC markers, CD44, CD24, CD166, and EpCAM, to define CRC-CSC. Paraffin embedded tissue samples from different grades of primary, untreated CRC were analyzed for the expression of four CSC markers CD44, CD326, CD24, and CD166, using immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometric analysis of CRC-CSC from HT29 (low grade) and HCT116 (high grade) human colorectal cancer cell lines was done. Marker-based isolation of CSC and non-CSC-bulk-tumor cells from HT29 was done using FACS, and tumor sphere assay was performed. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the expression of CD44, CD326, and CD166 between cases and controls. A novel cutoff distribution of CD44 and CD166 was suggested to help for better immunohistochemical analysis of CRC. Higher prevalence of CSC was seen in high-grade CRC as compared to low-grade CRC. Sorted and cultured CD44 + CD166+ cells formed tumor spheres, suggesting that these cells, having properties of self renewal and anchorage independent proliferation, were in fact CSC. Hence, CD44 and CD166 may serve as good CRC-CSC markers when used together with novel cutoff immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression levels.

Indexed as

Activated-Leukocyte Cell Adhesion MoleculeAdenocarcinomaAdultAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalColorectal NeoplasmsEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleFetal ProteinsFlow CytometryHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsImmunoenzyme TechniquesLymphatic MetastasisActivated-Leukocyte Cell Adhesion MoleculeALCAM protein, humanAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCD24 protein, humanCD44 protein, humanCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFetal ProteinsHyaluronan ReceptorsCancer stem cellsCD166CD44Colorectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.