Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27507303›Full record

SynthesisBMC palliative care2016

Benefits of interventions for respiratory secretion management in adult palliative care patients-a systematic review.

Juliano Ferreira Arcuri, Ebun Abarshi, Nancy J Preston, Jenny Brine, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Concise review of end of life and palliative care in neuromuscular pathologies: still a long pathway ahead.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2024
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. [Endotracheal suctioning].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Article
  6. Symptom Management and Supportive Care of Serious COVID-19 Patients and their Families in India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliano Ferreira ArcuriFederal University of São Carlos, Rod Washington Luiz, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13565-905, Brazil. julianoarcuri@gmail.com.
Ebun AbarshiInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, LA1 4YG, UK.
Nancy J PrestonInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, LA1 4YG, UK.
Jenny BrineLancaster University Library, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, LA1 4YG, UK.
Valéria Amorim Pires Di LorenzoFederal University of São Carlos, Rod Washington Luiz, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13565-905, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory secretions impact negatively on palliative patients. Unfortunately, a gold standard therapy is not yet available. The purpose of this study was to identify which interventions are in use to control respiratory secretions in patients with chronic disease with a poor prognosis and verify their effects on outcomes relevant for palliative care patients.

methodsA systematic review of the literature with narrative summary was conducted. We searched eight electronic databases in April (6th), 2016. Citation-tracking and reference list searches were conducted. We included randomized controlled trials, crossover trials, observational and qualitative studies regarding interventions for respiratory secretion management in adult patients with chronic diseases that met inclusion criteria indicating short prognosis.

resultsSix randomized controlled trials, 11 observational studies, ten crossover trials and one qualitative study were found. Interventions included mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE), expiratory muscle training, manually-assisted cough, tracheotomy, chest physiotherapy, suctioning, air stacking, electrical stimulation of abdominal muscles, nebulized saline, positive expiratory pressure masks, percussive ventilation, high frequency chest wall oscillations. The interventions with most promising benefits to patients in palliative care were manually-assisted cough and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote expectoration and percussive ventilation to improve mucous clearance.

conclusionTherapies, such as manually assisted cough, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation and percussive ventilation, which aim to deal with respiratory secretion, were the most promising treatment for use in palliative care for specific diseases. Nevertheless, the evidence still needs to improve in order to identify which treatment is the best.

Indexed as

AdultChronic DiseaseCoughCross-Over StudiesExpectorantsHumansInsufflationObservational Studies as TopicPalliative CarePatient SatisfactionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPositive-Pressure RespirationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory SystemRespiratory TherapyRespiratory Tract DiseasesExpectorantsCoughPalliative CareRespiratory secretionSputum

Identifiers

PMID27507303
PMCPMC4979117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.