Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27507184›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

Sex change and effective population size: implications for population genetic studies in marine fish.

I Coscia, J Chopelet, R S Waples, B Q Mann, S Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The reproductive biology ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Consequences of sex change for effective population size.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I CosciaLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
J ChopeletSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
R S WaplesNOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
B Q MannOceanographic Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
S MarianiEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, The University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large variance in reproductive success is the primary factor that reduces effective population size (Ne) in natural populations. In sequentially hermaphroditic (sex-changing) fish, the sex ratio is typically skewed and biased towards the 'first' sex, while reproductive success increases considerably after sex change. Therefore, sex-changing fish populations are theoretically expected to have lower Ne than gonochorists (separate sexes), assuming all other parameters are essentially equal. In this study, we estimate Ne from genetic data collected from two ecologically similar species living along the eastern coast of South Africa: one gonochoristic, the 'santer' sea bream Cheimerius nufar, and one protogynous (female-first) sex changer, the 'slinger' sea bream Chrysoblephus puniceus. For both species, no evidence of genetic structuring, nor significant variation in genetic diversity, was found in the study area. Estimates of contemporary Ne were significantly lower in the protogynous species, but the same pattern was not apparent over historical timescales. Overall, our results show that sequential hermaphroditism may affect Ne differently over varying time frames, and that demographic signatures inferred from genetic markers with different inheritance modes also need to be interpreted cautiously, in relation to sex-changing life histories.

Indexed as

Population DensitySex Determination ProcessesAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationLife History TraitsLinkage DisequilibriumMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsReproductionSea BreamSequence Analysis, DNASex RatioSouth AfricaDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID27507184
PMCPMC5026757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.