Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27507169›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

An integrative and applicable phylogenetic footprinting framework for cis-regulatory motifs identification in prokaryotic genomes.

Bingqiang Liu, Hanyuan Zhang, Chuan Zhou, Guojun Li, Anne Fennell, Guanghui Wang, Yu Kang, Qi Liu, Qin Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Transcriptomic Response of Cells of the Thermophilic BacteriumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediatedHorticulture research · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bingqiang LiuSchool of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Hanyuan ZhangSystems Biology and Biomedical Informatics (SBBI) Laboratory University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0115, USA.
Chuan ZhouSchool of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Guojun LiSchool of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Anne FennellDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Guanghui WangSchool of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Yu KangCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and information, Beijing Institute of Genomics of CAS, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China.
Qi LiuDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Qin MaDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. qin.ma@sdstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3264-8392
Shandong University · CNBrookings Institution · USBeijing Institute of Genomics · CNTongji University · CNUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhylogenetic footprinting is an important computational technique for identifying cis-regulatory motifs in orthologous regulatory regions from multiple genomes, as motifs tend to evolve slower than their surrounding non-functional sequences. Its application, however, has several difficulties for optimizing the selection of orthologous data and reducing the false positives in motif prediction.

resultsHere we present an integrative phylogenetic footprinting framework for accurate motif predictions in prokaryotic genomes (MP(3)). The framework includes a new orthologous data preparation procedure, an additional promoter scoring and pruning method and an integration of six existing motif finding algorithms as basic motif search engines. Specifically, we collected orthologous genes from available prokaryotic genomes and built the orthologous regulatory regions based on sequence similarity of promoter regions. This procedure made full use of the large-scale genomic data and taxonomy information and filtered out the promoters with limited contribution to produce a high quality orthologous promoter set. The promoter scoring and pruning is implemented through motif voting by a set of complementary predicting tools that mine as many motif candidates as possible and simultaneously eliminate the effect of random noise. We have applied the framework to Escherichia coli k12 genome and evaluated the prediction performance through comparison with seven existing programs. This evaluation was systematically carried out at the nucleotide and binding site level, and the results showed that MP(3) consistently outperformed other popular motif finding tools. We have integrated MP(3) into our motif identification and analysis server DMINDA, allowing users to efficiently identify and analyze motifs in 2,072 completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes.

conclusionThe performance evaluation indicated that MP(3) is effective for predicting regulatory motifs in prokaryotic genomes. Its application may enhance progress in elucidating transcription regulation mechanism, thus provide benefit to the genomic research community and prokaryotic genome researchers in particular.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsNucleotide MotifsPhylogenyRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAlgorithmsBinding SitesEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialModels, StatisticalProkaryotic CellsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingCis-regulatory motifComparative genomicsPhylogenetic footprintingProkaryotic genomes

Identifiers

PMID27507169
PMCPMC4977642
OpenAlexW2508081817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.