Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27507131›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2016

Subjective mood and energy levels of healthy weight and overweight/obese healthy adults on high-and low-glycemic load experimental diets.

Kara L Breymeyer, Johanna W Lampe, Bonnie A McGregor, Marian L Neuhouser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00622661 (A Feeding Study to Examine the Effect of Glycemic Load and Obesity on Cancer Biomarkers), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00622661 nacompletednot on this map

A Feeding Study to Examine the Effect of Glycemic Load and Obesity on Cancer Biomarkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2006 to 2010Enrolled89ConditionsHealthy, OverweightArmsLow Glycemic Load Diet, High Glycemic Load Diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kara L BreymeyerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, 98109, United States. Electronic address: kbreymey@fredhutch.org.
Johanna W LampeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, 98109, United States. Electronic address: jlampe@fredhutch.org.
Bonnie A McGregorFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, 98109, United States. Electronic address: bonnie@orionskywellness.org.
Marian L NeuhouserFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, 98109, United States. Electronic address: mneuhous@fredhutch.org.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Preventing obesity in low income working adultsU54CA116847 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MCTIERNAN, ANNE M. · 2005 to 2010
$12.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS U54 CA116847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests a positive association of diet and obesity with depression. Researchers have examined several diet-mood hypotheses, including investigating the extent to which carbohydrates may impact mood. There is limited research on how glycemic load, a characteristic of carbohydrates, impacts mood in healthy adults. Eighty-two healthy weight and overweight/obese, but otherwise healthy, adults enrolled in a randomized, crossover controlled feeding study testing low-compared to high-glycemic load diets. All participants completed self-report mood and energy level questionnaires during each arm of the intervention. Diets were isocaloric and were matched by macronutrient content as a percent of total energy. Mood was assessed with the Profile of Mood States (POMS) subscales; tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment, total mood disturbance (TMD), and negative affect (NA) in addition to the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression (CES-D) scale at baseline and end of both 28-day feeding periods. Linear mixed models tested the intervention effect on mood, controlling for baseline POMS and CES-D scores, diet type, diet sequence, feeding period, sex, and percent body fat classification. The consumption of the high-glycemic load diet resulted in a 38% higher score for depressive symptoms on the CES-D (P = 0.002) compared to the low-glycemic load diet as well as 55% higher score for TMD (P = 0.05), and 26% higher score for fatigue/inertia (P = 0.04). In subgroup analyses, the overweight/obese participants had 40% higher scores on the CES-D scale compared to healthy weight participants (P = 0.05). In conclusion, a high-glycemic load diet was associated with higher depression symptoms, total mood disturbance, and fatigue compared to a low-glycemic load diet especially in overweight/obese, but otherwise healthy, adults. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00622661.

Indexed as

AffectDepressionDietFatigueGlycemic LoadAdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultControlled trialDepressionDietGlycemic indexHumansObesity

Identifiers

PMID27507131
PMCPMC5154680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.