Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506860›Full record

ArticleSurgery2016

Rural risk: Geographic disparities in trauma mortality.

Molly P Jarman, Renan C Castillo, Anthony R Carlini, Lisa M Kodadek, Adil H Haider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Strategies for improving rural trauma health systems.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The differences in injury patterns and outcomes of thoracic trauma between rural and urban level two trauma centers in a single country.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Are the life-saving interventions really life-saving?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Molly P JarmanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mjarman2@jhu.edu.
Renan C CastilloDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Anthony R CarliniDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Lisa M KodadekDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Adil H HaiderDivision of Trauma, Burn and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA.

Funding

TRAINING IN HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCHT32HS000029 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS · 1987 to 2024
$8.3M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarriers to trauma care for rural populations are well documented, but little is known about the magnitude of urban-rural disparities in injury mortality. This study sought to quantify differences in injury mortality comparing rural and nonrural residents with traumatic injuries.

methodsUsing data from the 2009-2010 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate odds of death after traumatic injury for rural residents compared with nonrural residents, while controlling for age, sex, injury type and severity, comorbidities, trauma designation, and Census region.

resultsRural residents were 14% more likely to die after traumatic injury compared with nonrural residents (P < .001). Increased odds of death for rural residents were observed at level I (odds ratio = 1.20, P < .001), level II (odds ratio = 1.34, P < .001), and level IV/nontrauma centers (odds ratio = 1.23, P < .001). The disparity was greatest for injuries occurring in the South and Midwest (odds ratio = 1.54, P < .001 and odds ratio = 2.06, P < .001, respectively) and for cases with an injury severity score <9 or unknown severity (odds ratio = 2.09, P < .001 and odds ratio = 1.31, P < .001, respectively).

conclusionRural residents are significantly more likely than nonrural residents to die after traumatic injury. This disparity varies by trauma center designation, injury severity, and US Census region. Distance and time to treatment likely play a role in rural injury outcomes, along with regional differences in prehospital care and trauma system organization.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityRural Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInjury Severity ScoreLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID27506860
PMCPMC5118091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.