Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506838›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Writing of H3K4Me3 overcomes epigenetic silencing in a sustained but context-dependent manner.

David Cano-Rodriguez, Rutger A F Gjaltema, Laura J Jilderda, Pytrick Jellema, Jelleke Dokter-Fokkens, Marcel H J Ruiters, Marianne G Rots

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advances and clinical potential of epigenome editing.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  9. Epigenome editing based treatment: Progresses and challenges.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reversing transgene silencing via targeted chromatin editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David Cano-RodriguezEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rutger A F GjaltemaEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Laura J JilderdaEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pytrick JellemaEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jelleke Dokter-FokkensEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel H J RuitersEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marianne G RotsEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone modifications reflect gene activity, but the relationship between cause and consequence of transcriptional control is heavily debated. Recent developments in rewriting local histone codes of endogenous genes elucidated instructiveness of certain marks in regulating gene expression. Maintenance of such repressive epigenome editing is controversial, while stable reactivation is still largely unexplored. Here we demonstrate sustained gene re-expression using two types of engineered DNA-binding domains fused to a H3K4 methyltransferase. Local induction of H3K4me3 is sufficient to allow re-expression of silenced target genes in various cell types. Maintenance of the re-expression is achieved, but strongly depends on the chromatin microenvironment (that is, DNA methylation status). We further identify H3K79me to be essential in allowing stable gene re-expression, confirming its role in epigenetic crosstalk for stable reactivation. Our approach uncovers potent epigenetic modifications to be directly written onto genomic loci to stably activate any given gene.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingTranscriptional ActivationCell LineChromatinDNA MethylationGenetic EngineeringHistonesHumansMethyltransferasesProtein DomainsChromatinHistonesMethyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID27506838
PMCPMC4987519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.