Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506526›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2016

Key to Opening Kidney for In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation Entrance in Health and Disease: Part II: Mechanistic Models and In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation.

Daniel Scotcher, Christopher Jones, Maria Posada, Aleksandra Galetin, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of small molecules: How much progress have we made?Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novel method for kinetic analysis applied to transport by the uniporter OCT2.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prediction of Drug Clearance from Enzyme and Transporter Kinetics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predicting tubular reabsorption with a human kidney proximal tubule tissue-on-a-chip and physiologically-based modeling.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2020
    Article
  15. Molecular and cellular physiology of organic cation transporter 2.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel ScotcherCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Christopher JonesDMPK, Oncology iMed, AstraZeneca R&D Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK.
Maria PosadaDrug Disposition, Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46203, USA.
Aleksandra GaletinCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Amin Rostami-HodjeganCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. amin.rostami@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3917-844X
University of Manchester · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBEli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is envisaged that application of mechanistic models will improve prediction of changes in renal disposition due to drug-drug interactions, genetic polymorphism in enzymes and transporters and/or renal impairment. However, developing and validating mechanistic kidney models is challenging due to the number of processes that may occur (filtration, secretion, reabsorption and metabolism) in this complex organ. Prediction of human renal drug disposition from preclinical species may be hampered by species differences in the expression and activity of drug metabolising enzymes and transporters. A proposed solution is bottom-up prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters based on in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), mediated by recent advances in in vitro experimental techniques and application of relevant scaling factors. This review is a follow-up to the Part I of the report from the 2015 AAPS Annual Meeting and Exhibition (Orlando, FL; 25th-29th October 2015) which focuses on IVIVE and mechanistic prediction of renal drug disposition. It describes the various mechanistic kidney models that may be used to investigate renal drug disposition. Particular attention is given to efforts that have attempted to incorporate elements of IVIVE. In addition, the use of mechanistic models in prediction of renal drug-drug interactions and potential for application in determining suitable adjustment of dose in kidney disease are discussed. The need for suitable clinical pharmacokinetics data for the purposes of delineating mechanistic aspects of kidney models in various scenarios is highlighted.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCongresses as TopicDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansKidneyMetabolic Clearance RatePharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationsactive renal excretionhuman kidney transportershuman renal drug clearancekidney diseasenon-hepatic drug metabolism

Identifiers

PMID27506526
OpenAlexW2491156638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.