Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506453›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Enriched retinal ganglion cells derived from human embryonic stem cells.

Katherine P Gill, Sandy S C Hung, Alexei Sharov, Camden Y Lo, Karina Needham, Grace E Lidgerwood, Stacey Jackson, Duncan E Crombie, Bryony A Nayagam, Anthony L Cook and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. OPA1 Dominant Optic Atrophy: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Targets.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine P GillCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Sandy S C HungCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Alexei SharovNational Institute of Aging, National Institutes for Health, USA.
Camden Y LoMonash Micro Imaging, Monash University, Australia.
Karina NeedhamDepartment of Otolaryngology &Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, and Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia.
Grace E LidgerwoodCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Stacey JacksonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Duncan E CrombieCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Bryony A NayagamDepartments of Audiology and Speech Pathology &Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Anthony L CookWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Australia.
Alex W HewittCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Alice PébayCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Raymond C B WongCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital &Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Eye Research Australia · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUInstitute on Aging · USMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optic neuropathies are characterised by a loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that lead to vision impairment. Development of cell therapy requires a better understanding of the signals that direct stem cells into RGCs. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) represent an unlimited cellular source for generation of human RGCs in vitro. In this study, we present a 45-day protocol that utilises magnetic activated cell sorting to generate enriched population of RGCs via stepwise retinal differentiation using hESCs. We performed an extensive characterization of these stem cell-derived RGCs by examining the gene and protein expressions of a panel of neural/RGC markers. Furthermore, whole transcriptome analysis demonstrated similarity of the hESC-derived RGCs to human adult RGCs. The enriched hESC-RGCs possess long axons, functional electrophysiological profiles and axonal transport of mitochondria, suggestive of maturity. In summary, this RGC differentiation protocol can generate an enriched population of functional RGCs from hESCs, allowing future studies on disease modeling of optic neuropathies and development of cell therapies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell SeparationGene Expression ProfilingHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansMagnetic FieldsRetinal Ganglion CellsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27506453
PMCPMC4978994
OpenAlexW2482409759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.