Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506450›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2016

Type I Interferons Interfere with the Capacity of mRNA Lipoplex Vaccines to Elicit Cytolytic T Cell Responses.

Ans De Beuckelaer, Charlotte Pollard, Sandra Van Lint, Kenny Roose, Lien Van Hoecke, Thomas Naessens, Vimal Kumar Udhayakumar, Muriel Smet, Niek Sanders, Stefan Lienenklaus and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Immunology of RNA-based vaccines: The critical interplay between inflammation and expression.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ans De BeuckelaerDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Charlotte PollardDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Virology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sandra Van LintDepartment of Biochemistry, Cytokine Receptor Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.
Kenny RooseMedical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Lien Van HoeckeMedical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas NaessensDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Vimal Kumar UdhayakumarDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Muriel SmetDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Niek SandersFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Gene Therapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stefan LienenklausInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, Institute for Experimental Infection Research, TWINCORE, Hannover, Germany.
Xavier SaelensMedical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Siegfried WeissInstitute of Immunology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany; Department of Molecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Guido VanhamDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Virology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Johan GrootenDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stefaan De KokerDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Laboratory Molecular Immunology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biochemistry, Cytokine Receptor Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: stefaan.dekoker@vib-ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given their high potential to evoke cytolytic T cell responses, tumor antigen-encoding messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are now being intensively explored as therapeutic cancer vaccines. mRNA vaccines clearly benefit from wrapping the mRNA into nano-sized carriers such as lipoplexes that protect the mRNA from degradation and increase its uptake by dendritic cells in vivo. Nevertheless, the early innate host factors that regulate the induction of cytolytic T cells to mRNA lipoplex vaccines have remained unresolved. Here, we demonstrate that mRNA lipoplexes induce a potent type I interferon (IFN) response upon subcutaneous, intradermal and intranodal injection. Regardless of the route of immunization applied, these type I IFNs interfered with the generation of potent cytolytic T cell responses. Most importantly, blocking type I IFN signaling at the site of immunization through the use of an IFNAR blocking antibody greatly enhanced the prophylactic and therapeutic antitumor efficacy of mRNA lipoplexes in the highly aggressive B16 melanoma model. As type I IFN induction appears to be inherent to the mRNA itself rather than to unique properties of the mRNA lipoplex formulation, preventing type I IFN induction and/or IFNAR signaling at the site of immunization might constitute a widely applicable strategy to improve the potency of mRNA vaccination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesCancer VaccinesHumansInjections, IntradermalInjections, SubcutaneousInterferon Type ILiposomesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceReceptor, Interferon alpha-betaRNA, MessengerT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTreatment OutcomeAntibodiesCancer VaccinesInterferon Type ILiposomesReceptor, Interferon alpha-betaRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID27506450
PMCPMC5154477
OpenAlexW2484775100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.