ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2016
Microbial Biotechnology 2020; microbiology of fossil fuel resources.
Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current landscape and future directions of synthetic biology in South America.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Metabolic Exchange with Non-Alkane-Consuming Pseudomonas stutzeri SLG510A3-8 ImprovesApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Phylogenomic Classification and Biosynthetic Potential of the Fossil Fuel-BiodesulfurizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Biological hydrogen production: molecular and electrolytic perspectives.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2019Review
- Kinetic modeling of Stickland reactions-coupled methanogenesis for a methanogenic culture.AMB Express · 2019Article
- How to access and exploit natural resources sustainably: petroleum biotechnology.Microbial biotechnology · 2017Article
- Editorial: Petroleum Microbial Biotechnology: Challenges and Prospects.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Microbial Biotechnology 2020; microbiology of fossil fuel resources.Microbial biotechnology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This roadmap examines the future of microbiology research and technology in fossil fuel energy recovery. Globally, the human population will be reliant on fossil fuels for energy and chemical feedstocks for at least the medium term. Microbiology is already important in many areas relevant to both upstream and downstream activities in the oil industry. However, the discipline has struggled for recognition in a world dominated by geophysicists and engineers despite widely known but still poorly understood microbially mediated processes e.g. reservoir biodegradation, reservoir souring and control, microbial enhanced oil recovery. The role of microbiology is even less understood in developing industries such as shale gas recovery by fracking or carbon capture by geological storage. In the future, innovative biotechnologies may offer new routes to reduced emissions pathways especially when applied to the vast unconventional heavy oil resources formed, paradoxically, from microbial activities in the geological past. However, despite this potential, recent low oil prices may make industry funding hard to come by and recruitment of microbiologists by the oil and gas industry may not be a high priority. With regards to public funded research and the imperative for cheap secure energy for economic growth in a growing world population, there are signs of inherent conflicts between policies aimed at a low carbon future using renewable technologies and policies which encourage technologies which maximize recovery from our conventional and unconventional fossil fuel assets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.