ArticleScientific reports2016
Functional lignocellulosic materials prepared by ATRP from a wood scaffold.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interconnecting EDOT-Based Polymers with Native Lignin toward Enhanced Charge Storage in Conductive Wood.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Robust flexural performance and fracture behavior of TiONature communications · 2023Article
- A New Protocol for Ash Wood Modification: Synthesis of Hydrophobic and Antibacterial Brushes from the Wood Surface.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sustainable Wood Nanotechnologies for Wood Composites Processed by In-Situ Polymerization.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Article
- High strength and low swelling composite hydrogels from gelatin and delignified wood.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Nanoscale Chemical Features of the Natural Fibrous Material Wood.Biomacromolecules · 2020Article
- Porous Graphene-like Carbon from Fast Catalytic Decomposition of Biomass for Energy Storage Applications.ACS omega · 2019Article
- Visualization of the Stimuli-responsive Surface Behavior of Functionalized Wood Material by Chemical Force Microscopy.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- High retreatability and dimensional stability of polymer grafted waterlogged archaeological wood achieved by ARGET ATRP.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Preparation of a balsa-lysozyme eco-friendly dressing and its effect on wound healing.RSC advances · 2018Article
- Surface Modification of Wood Flour via ARGET ATRP and Its Application as Filler in Thermoplastics.Polymers · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wood, a natural and abundant source of organic polymers, has been used as a scaffold to develop novel wood-polymer hybrid materials. Through a two-step surface-initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP), the porous wood structure can be effectively modified with polymer chains of various nature. In the present study, polystyrene and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) were used. As shown with various characterization techniques including confocal Raman microscopy, FTIR, and SEM/EDX, the native wood ultrastructure and features are retained and the polymer chains can be introduced deep within the wood, i.e. inside the wood cell walls. The physical properties of the new materials have been studied, and results indicate that the insertion of polymer chains inside the wood cell wall alters the intrinsic properties of wood to yield a hybrid composite material with new functionalities. This approach to the functionalization of wood could lead to the fabrication of a new class of interesting functional materials and promote innovative utilizations of the renewable resource wood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.