Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506334›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology

Impact of androgen-deprivation therapy on the outcome of dose-escalation prostate cancer radiotherapy without elective pelvic irradiation.

Wei-Hsien Hou, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chia-Chun Wang, Keng-Hsueh Lan, Chung-Hsin Chen, Hong-Jen Yu, Shih-Ping Liu, Ming-Kuen Lai, Yeong-Shau Pu, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Hsien HouDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Chao-Yuan HuangDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Chia-Chun WangDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Keng-Hsueh LanDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Chung-Hsin ChenDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Hong-Jen YuDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Shih-Ping LiuDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Ming-Kuen LaiDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Yeong-Shau PuDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Jason Chia-Hsien ChengDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with dose-escalated radiotherapy (DERT) for localized prostate cancer has not been determined in randomized studies. In this study, the benefit of ADT was assessed in patients uniformly treated with dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles but not pelvis. In all, 419 patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma underwent definitive IMRT (cumulative dose 78 Gy), with 32.6%, 33.1%, 32.1%, and 2.1% having T1 through T4 disease, respectively, and 51.2% having high-risk disease. ADT was given to 76.1% of patients. With a median follow-up of 60 months, 5-year biochemical failure-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 87%, 86%, and 87%, respectively. T stage was an independent predictor of all three rates. Five-year pelvic nodal recurrence rate was 2.9%. ADT improved biochemical failure-free and disease-free survival but not overall survival. ADT showed benefit in high-risk disease but not intermediate-risk disease. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities ≥ grade 2 occurred in 11.0% and 6.7%, respectively. In conclusion, DERT with 78 Gy yields good disease control and low rate of pelvic nodal recurrence. ADT improves disease-free survival in patients with high-risk but not intermediate-risk disease.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPelvisProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAndrogen Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID27506334
PMCPMC5566856
OpenAlexW2416580883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.