Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506292›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2016

The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana.

Robin C Nesbitt, Terhi J Lohela, Seyi Soremekun, Linda Vesel, Alexander Manu, Eunice Okyere, Chris Grundy, Seeba Amenga-Etego, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Betty R Kirkwood and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robin C NesbittEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Terhi J LohelaEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Seyi SoremekunMaternal &Child Health Intervention Research Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Linda VeselInnovations for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Initiative, Concern Worldwide US, New York, USA.
Alexander ManuMaternal &Child Health Intervention Research Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Eunice OkyereDepartment of Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Chris GrundyMaternal &Child Health Intervention Research Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Seeba Amenga-EtegoKintampo Health Research Center, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana.
Seth Owusu-AgyeiKintampo Health Research Center, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana.
Betty R KirkwoodMaternal &Child Health Intervention Research Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sabine GabryschEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahafo region in Ghana, we combined surveillance data on 11,274 deliveries with quality of care data from all 64 delivery facilities in the study area. We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression to assess the influence of distance and several quality dimensions on place of delivery. Women lived a median of 3.3 km from the closest delivery facility, and 58% delivered in a facility. The probability of facility delivery ranged from 68% among women living 1 km from their closest facility to 22% among those living 25 km away, adjusted for confounders. Measured quality of care at the closest facility was not associated with use, except that facility delivery was lower when the closest facility provided substandard care on the EmOC dimension. These results do not imply, however, that we should increase geographic accessibility of care without improving facility quality. While this may be successful in increasing facility deliveries, such care cannot be expected to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGhanaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsParturitionPregnancyQuality of Health CareRural Population

Identifiers

PMID27506292
PMCPMC4978958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.