Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506251›Full record

ReviewMolecules and cells2016

Brain Reward Circuits in Morphine Addiction.

Juhwan Kim, Suji Ham, Heeok Hong, Changjong Moon, Heh-In Im

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules and cells, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Effects of GABAResearch in pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juhwan KimCenter for Neuroscience, Brain Science Institute, Seoul 02792, Korea.
Suji HamCenter for Neuroscience, Brain Science Institute, Seoul 02792, Korea.
Heeok HongDepartment of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05029, Korea.
Changjong MoonDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Medical Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea.
Heh-In ImCenter for Neuroscience, Brain Science Institute, Seoul 02792, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphine is the most potent analgesic for chronic pain, but its clinical use has been limited by the opiate's innate tendency to produce tolerance, severe withdrawal symptoms and rewarding properties with a high risk of relapse. To understand the addictive properties of morphine, past studies have focused on relevant molecular and cellular changes in the brain, highlighting the functional roles of reward-related brain regions. Given the accumulated findings, a recent, emerging trend in morphine research is that of examining the dynamics of neuronal interactions in brain reward circuits under the influence of morphine action. In this review, we highlight recent findings on the roles of several reward circuits involved in morphine addiction based on pharmacological, molecular and physiological evidences.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansMorphineMorphine DependenceNeural PathwaysSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeMorphineaddictionmorphineopiatereward circuitswithdrawal symptom

Identifiers

PMID27506251
PMCPMC5050528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.