ArticleChemical senses2016
Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?
Article in Chemical senses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- New insight into human sweet taste: a genome-wide association study of the perception and intake of sweet substances.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Phenome-wide investigation of dietary and health outcomes associated with bitter taste receptor gene TAS2R38.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Paternal grandmother's smoking in pregnancy is associated with extreme aversion to bitter taste in their grandchildren.Environmental epigenetics · 2022Article
- NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Article
- Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A genome-wide association study of bitter and sweet beverage consumption.Human molecular genetics · 2019Article
- Associations between brain structure and perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes.Behavioural brain research · 2019Article
- Understanding the role of bitter taste perception in coffee, tea and alcohol consumption through Mendelian randomization.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Bivariate genome-wide association analysis strengthens the role of bitter receptor clusters on chromosomes 7 and 12 in human bitter taste.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Neuroimaging, neuromodulation, and population health: the neuroscience of chronic disease prevention.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2018Review
- The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceived intensities of sweetness and bitterness are correlated with one another and each is influenced by genetics. The extent to which these correlations share common genetic variation, however, remains unclear. In a mainly adolescent sample ( n = 1901, mean age 16.2 years), including 243 monozygotic (MZ) and 452 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, we estimated the covariance among the perceived intensities of 4 bitter compounds (6- n -propylthiouracil [PROP], sucrose octa-acetate, quinine, caffeine) and 4 sweeteners (the weighted mean ratings of glucose, fructose, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone, aspartame) with multivariate genetic modeling. The sweetness factor was moderately correlated with sucrose octa-acetate, quinine, and caffeine ( rp = 0.35-0.40). This was mainly due to a shared genetic factor ( rg = 0.46-0.51) that accounted for 17-37% of the variance in the 3 bitter compounds' ratings and 8% of the variance in general sweetness ratings. In contrast, an association between sweetness and PROP only became evident after adjusting for the TAS2R38 diplotype ( rp increased from 0.18 to 0.32) with the PROP genetic factor accounting for 6% of variance in sweetness. These genetic associations were not inflated by scale use bias, as the cross-trait correlations for both MZ and DZ twins were weak. There was also little evidence for mediation by cognition or behavioral factors. This suggests an overlap of genetic variance between perceptions of sweetness and bitterness from a variety of stimuli, which includes PROP when considering the TAS2R38 diplotype. The most likely sources of shared variation are within genes encoding post-receptor transduction mechanisms common to the various taste G protein-coupled receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.