Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27506221›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2016

Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Liang-Dar Hwang, Paul A S Breslin, Danielle R Reed, Gu Zhu, Nicholas G Martin, Margaret J Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liang-Dar HwangQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane , Queensland 4006 , Australia.
Paul A S BreslinMonell Chemical Senses Center , Philadelphia, PA 19104 , USA.
Danielle R ReedMonell Chemical Senses Center , Philadelphia, PA 19104 , USA.
Gu ZhuQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane , Queensland 4006 , Australia.
Nicholas G MartinQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane , Queensland 4006 , Australia.
Margaret J WrightQueensland Brain Institute , University of Queensland , Brisbane , Queensland 4072 , Australia and.

Funding

Human Umami Taste: Genetics of Psychophysical TraitsR01DC002995 · NIDCD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BRESLIN, PAUL A. S · 2002 to 2012
$4.2M
Role of Metabolic Sensing in Human Sweet TasteR01DC014286 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI BRESLIN, PAUL A. S, MARGOLSKEE, ROBERT F. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
TASTE MATCHING--GUSTATORY EQUIVALENCE CLASSESR29DC002995 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI BRESLIN, PAUL A.S. · 1997 to 2001
$200k
Targeted genotyping and gene expression with the QuantStudio 12K FlexS10OD018125 · OD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2015 to 2015
$185k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002995NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014286NIDCD NIH HHS R29 DC002995NIH HHS S10 OD018125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceived intensities of sweetness and bitterness are correlated with one another and each is influenced by genetics. The extent to which these correlations share common genetic variation, however, remains unclear. In a mainly adolescent sample ( n = 1901, mean age 16.2 years), including 243 monozygotic (MZ) and 452 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, we estimated the covariance among the perceived intensities of 4 bitter compounds (6- n -propylthiouracil [PROP], sucrose octa-acetate, quinine, caffeine) and 4 sweeteners (the weighted mean ratings of glucose, fructose, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone, aspartame) with multivariate genetic modeling. The sweetness factor was moderately correlated with sucrose octa-acetate, quinine, and caffeine ( rp = 0.35-0.40). This was mainly due to a shared genetic factor ( rg = 0.46-0.51) that accounted for 17-37% of the variance in the 3 bitter compounds' ratings and 8% of the variance in general sweetness ratings. In contrast, an association between sweetness and PROP only became evident after adjusting for the TAS2R38 diplotype ( rp increased from 0.18 to 0.32) with the PROP genetic factor accounting for 6% of variance in sweetness. These genetic associations were not inflated by scale use bias, as the cross-trait correlations for both MZ and DZ twins were weak. There was also little evidence for mediation by cognition or behavioral factors. This suggests an overlap of genetic variance between perceptions of sweetness and bitterness from a variety of stimuli, which includes PROP when considering the TAS2R38 diplotype. The most likely sources of shared variation are within genes encoding post-receptor transduction mechanisms common to the various taste G protein-coupled receptors.

Indexed as

IQpersonalitysweetenerTAS2R38tastetwins

Identifiers

PMID27506221
PMCPMC5070489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.