Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504877›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Identification and Functional Testing of ERCC2 Mutations in a Multi-national Cohort of Patients with Familial Breast- and Ovarian Cancer.

Andreas Rump, Anna Benet-Pages, Steffen Schubert, Jan Dominik Kuhlmann, Ramūnas Janavičius, Eva Macháčková, Lenka Foretová, Zdenek Kleibl, Filip Lhota, Petra Zemankova and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting Germline- and Tumor-Associated Nucleotide Excision Repair Defects in Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma of childhood and adolescence: a distinct entity characterized by DICER1 mutations.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Association BetweenFrontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas RumpInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7116-6364
Anna Benet-PagesMGZ-Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.
Steffen SchubertClinic for Dermatology Venerology and Allergology, Göttingen, Germany.
Jan Dominik KuhlmannGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.
Ramūnas JanavičiusVilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine Center, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Eva MacháčkováMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0246-1471
Lenka ForetováMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdenek KleiblInstitute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2050-9667
Filip LhotaInstitute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petra ZemankovaInstitute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Elitza Betcheva-KrajcirInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Luisa MackenrothInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Karl HackmannInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4181-2120
Janin LehmannClinic for Dermatology Venerology and Allergology, Göttingen, Germany.
Anke NissenMGZ-Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.
Nataliya DiDonatoInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Romy OpitzGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.
Holger ThieleCologne Center for Genomics, Cologne, Germany.
Karin KastGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.
Pauline WimbergerGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.
Elke Holinski-FederMGZ-Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.
Steffen EmmertClinic for Dermatology Venerology and Allergology, Göttingen, Germany.
Evelin SchröckInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3377-1704
Barbara KlinkInstitute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-8238
German Cancer Research Center · DECharles University · CZMedical Genetics Center · DEMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing application of gene panels for familial cancer susceptibility disorders will probably lead to an increased proposal of susceptibility gene candidates. Using ERCC2 DNA repair gene as an example, we show that proof of a possible role in cancer susceptibility requires a detailed dissection and characterization of the underlying mutations for genes with diverse cellular functions (in this case mainly DNA repair and basic cellular transcription). In case of ERCC2, panel sequencing of 1345 index cases from 587 German, 405 Lithuanian and 353 Czech families with breast and ovarian cancer (BC/OC) predisposition revealed 25 mutations (3 frameshift, 2 splice-affecting, 20 missense), all absent or very rare in the ExAC database. While 16 mutations were unique, 9 mutations showed up repeatedly with population-specific appearance. Ten out of eleven mutations that were tested exemplarily in cell-based functional assays exert diminished excision repair efficiency and/or decreased transcriptional activation capability. In order to provide evidence for BC/OC predisposition, we performed familial segregation analyses and screened ethnically matching controls. However, unlike the recently published RECQL example, none of our recurrent ERCC2 mutations showed convincing co-segregation with BC/OC or significant overrepresentation in the BC/OC cohort. Interestingly, we detected that some deleterious founder mutations had an unexpectedly high frequency of > 1% in the corresponding populations, suggesting that either homozygous carriers are not clinically recognized or homozygosity for these mutations is embryonically lethal. In conclusion, we provide a useful resource on the mutational landscape of ERCC2 mutations in hereditary BC/OC patients and, as our key finding, we demonstrate the complexity of correct interpretation for the discovery of "bonafide" breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseBreast NeoplasmsDNA RepairFemaleGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansMutation, MissenseOvarian NeoplasmsXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D ProteinERCC2 protein, humanXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein

Identifiers

PMID27504877
PMCPMC4978395
OpenAlexW2510840738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.