Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504741›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2016

Importance of spike timing in touch: an analogy with hearing?

Hannes P Saal, Xiaoqin Wang, Sliman J Bensmaia

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Encoding of Vibrotactile Stimuli by Mechanoreceptors in Rodent Glabrous Skin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiological noise facilitates multiplexed coding of vibrotactile-like signals in somatosensory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perceptual rivalry with vibrotactile stimuli.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannes P SaalDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Xiaoqin WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Sliman J BensmaiaDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: sliman@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

NEURAL BASIS OF COMMUNICATION SOUND PERCEPTIONR01DC003180 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 1997 to 2024
$12.0M
Probing somatosensory representations in the cuneate nucleus of awake primatesR01NS095162 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BENSMAIA, SLIMAN, MILLER, LEE · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003180NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Touch is often conceived as a spatial sense akin to vision. However, touch also involves the transduction and processing of signals that vary rapidly over time, inviting comparisons with hearing. In both sensory systems, first order afferents produce spiking responses that are temporally precise and the timing of their responses carries stimulus information. The precision and informativeness of spike timing in the two systems invites the possibility that both implement similar mechanisms to extract behaviorally relevant information from these precisely timed responses. Here, we explore the putative roles of spike timing in touch and hearing and discuss common mechanisms that may be involved in processing temporal spiking patterns.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsHearingSignal TransductionTouch

Identifiers

PMID27504741
PMCPMC5315566
OpenAlexW2515760647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.