Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504460›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2016

Impact of the Type of Continuous Insulin Administration on Metabolism in a Diabetic Rat Model.

A Schaschkow, C Mura, S Dal, A Langlois, E Seyfritz, C Sookhareea, W Bietiger, C Peronet, N Jeandidier, M Pinget and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A SchaschkowUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
C MuraUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-711X
S DalUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
A LangloisUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
E SeyfritzUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
C SookhareeaUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
W BietigerUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
C PeronetUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
N JeandidierUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolic Diseases, Pôle NUDE, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), 67000 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
M PingetUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolic Diseases, Pôle NUDE, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), 67000 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
S SigristUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
E MaillardUMR DIATHEC, EA 7294, Centre Européen d'Etude du Diabète, Université de Strasbourg (UdS), Boulevard René Leriche, 67200 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-7499
Université de Strasbourg · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exogenous insulin is the only treatment available for type 1 diabetic patients and is mostly administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in a basal and bolus scheme using insulin pens (injection) or pumps (preimplanted SC catheter). Some divergence exists between these two modes of administration, since pumps provide better glycaemic control compared to injections in humans. The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of two modes of insulin administration (single injections of long-acting insulin or pump delivery of rapid-acting insulin) at the same dosage (4 IU/200 g/day) on rat metabolism and tissues. The rat weight and blood glucose levels were measured periodically after treatment. Immunostaining for signs of oxidative stress and for macrophages was performed on the liver and omental tissues. The continuous insulin delivery by pumps restored normoglycaemia, which induced the reduction of both reactive oxygen species and macrophage infiltration into the liver and omentum. Injections controlled the glucose levels for only a short period of time and therefore tissue stress and inflammation were elevated. In conclusion, the insulin administration mode has a crucial impact on rat metabolic parameters, which has to be taken into account when studies are designed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseBody WeightDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin GlargineInsulin Infusion SystemsLiverMacrophagesMaleOmentumRatsRats, Inbred LewReactive Oxygen SpeciesBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin GlargineReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID27504460
PMCPMC4967706
OpenAlexW2488689953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.