Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504419›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Ethanolic Crude Lawsone and Listerine Mouthwash in Uncontrolled Diabetics and Denture Wearers - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bhavana Sujanamulk, Rajalakshmi Chintamaneni, Anuradha Chennupati, Prashant Nahar, Rattaiah Setty Chaluvadi, Ramakrishna Vemugunta, Meka Venkata Poorna Prabhat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic potential of Lawsonia inermis Linn: a comprehensive overview.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhavana SujanamulkPhD Candidate, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University , Udaipur, Rajasthan, India .
Rajalakshmi ChintamaneniAssociate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences , Gannavaram Mandal, Andhra Pradesh, India .
Anuradha ChennupatiPost Graduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences , Gannavaram Mandal, Andhra Pradesh, India .
Prashant NaharProfessor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University , Udaipur, Rajasthan, India .
Rattaiah Setty ChaluvadiProfessor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation , Gannavaram Mandal, Andhra Pradesh, India .
Ramakrishna VemuguntaAssistant Professor, Department of Pharmacognosy, KVSR Siddhartha College of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India .
Meka Venkata Poorna PrabhatProfessor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences , Gannavaram Mandal, Andhra Pradesh, India .
Pacific Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLawsonia Inermis (LI) is a shrub cultivated throughout India. Many in vitro studies have been done on antifungal activity of LI, although none of the studies have been conducted invivo.

aimTo evaluate the antifungal efficacy of ethanolic extract of crude lawsone in comparison with listerine mouth wash in known diabetics and wearing dentures. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 60 subjects were taken and randomly divided into two groups of 30 each. Group 1 received crude lawsone mouthwash and Group 2 received listerine mouth wash. Oral rinse technique was performed. Each subject was given distilled water at baseline and Colony Forming Units (CFU) of candidal species was determined. Post therapeutic samples were then collected 1hr and 1week following drug usage and they were further advised to use given mouth washes twice daily with volume of 5ml/rinse for 30 seconds and CFU was evaluated.

resultsCrude lawsone mouthwash showed superior antifungal activity when compared to listerine mouthwash. On individual comparison of both mouth washes at baseline, 1hr and 1week highly significant results were obtained using inferential statistics. The inter group comparison was done using independent t-test where lawsone was considered to be more effective in reducing CFU, at 1hr and 1week of using the mouth wash (p<0.01). Subjective symptoms like taste and smell were determined by chi square test where good taste was felt for lawsone and olfactory satisfaction was good with listerine (p<0.01). Burning sensation was found to be more with listerine mouth wash.

conclusionThe present study revealed superior antifungal activity with ethanolic extract of crude lawsone mouth wash compared with listerine mouthwash.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusLawsonia plantMouthwashesPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID27504419
PMCPMC4963779
OpenAlexW2467567548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.