Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504391›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Exploring the Management of Radiation Proctitis in Current Clinical Practice.

Nupur Bansal, Abhishek Soni, Paramjeet Kaur, Ashok Kumar Chauhan, Vivek Kaushal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on the management of the gastrointestinal effects of radiation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Management of Radiation Proctitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Radiation proctitis as a differential of lower GIT bleeding in Nigeria: A case series.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nupur BansalSenior Resident, Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak, India .
Abhishek SoniSenior Resident, Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak, India .
Paramjeet KaurAssociate Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak, India .
Ashok Kumar ChauhanSenior Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak, India .
Vivek KaushalSenior Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak, India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiation proctitis is radiation induced rectal mucositis, occurring as a consequence to radiation therapy of the pelvic organs for various pelvic region malignancies. The management of radiation proctitis is extremely challenging as no recommended guidelines are available and limited number of studies are there in the literature involving the various treatment options.

aimThe aim of the study is the in-depth review of published literature to see the role of various treatment modalities in the management of radiation proctitis. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn integrative review was undertaken within PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC, GOOGLE SEARCH databases and articles published upto February 2015 were reviewed and analysed. A total of 54 studies were included.

resultsLiterature suggests that non surgical therapies are the first line of treatment and surgery is reserved for advanced or refractory cases. Endoscopic therapies form the mainstay of treatment in managing the patients of radiation proctitis. Argon plasma coagulation and laser therapies are preferred. Radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and mesenchymal stem cell therapy are the upcoming modalities. Medical therapy can be tried alone or in conjunction to endoscopic therapies. In the resistant or refractory cases, surgery can be looked for in the form of diversion or resection with or without anastamosis.

conclusionThough, a number of options are available, still a lot can be explored in this field to improve the morbidity in the patients and to confirm the superiority of one treatment over other.

Indexed as

EndoscopicMedicalProctopathySteroidsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID27504391
PMCPMC4963751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.