Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504280›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Anthropometric Predictors of Bio-Impedance Analysis (BIA) Phase Angle in Healthy Adults.

Nazeem Ishrat Siddiqui, Sarfaraz Alam Khan, Mohammad Shoeb, Sukhwant Bose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Does Body Position Influence Bioelectrical Impedance? An Observational Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazeem Ishrat SiddiquiProfessor, Department of Physiology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute , Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India .
Sarfaraz Alam KhanAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, CIMS Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India .
Mohammad ShoebAssistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, SSMV , Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India .
Sukhwant BoseDirector Professor, Department of Physiology and Director Medical Education, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute , Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhase Angle (PhA) is a ratio of whole body reactance and resistance obtained from Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). It indicates cellular health and integrity and is considered as prognostic tool in medical disorders. In spite of prognostic potentials of PhA, it has limited usefulness in clinical practice and in population studies because of non-availability of normal population reference limits for comparison. Moreover, it is influenced by various factors like age, sex, race and body composition (i.e. body fat, muscle mass, visceral fat, body cell mass, total body water, etc).

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of phase angle which will be useful in formulation of reference values for Indian population. MATERIALS AND

methodsBIA was performed by Tanita Body Composition Analyser on healthy adults aged 17-24 years. The inbuilt software measured the phase angle by the formula: Phase angle (PhA) = Reactance (xc)/Resistance (R)* (180/π). Phase angle values were compared across categories of age, sex, weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), total fat, visceral fat and muscle mass.

resultsMean value of phase angle was found to be 5.65. Phase angle was significantly (p< 0.001) higher in male than in female. Phase angle was significantly predicted from height (p< 0.001), weight (p< 0.002), muscle mass (p< 0.002) and visceral fat (p< 0.02) in multiple regression models.

conclusionPhase angle differs across anthropometric and body composition categories. Thus height, weight and muscle mass should also be taken into consideration while deriving population specific reference limits of phase angle.

Indexed as

Anthropometric predictorsBio-Impedance AnalysisBody composition analysisPhase angleReactance and resistance

Identifiers

PMID27504280
PMCPMC4963640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.