Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504249›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ivermectin compared with current topical treatments for the inflammatory lesions of rosacea: a network meta-analysis.

Kashif Siddiqui, Linda Stein Gold, Japinder Gill

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Current Trends and Future Insights on Rosacea Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clindamycin: A Comprehensive Status Report with Emphasis on Use in Dermatology.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Update on the Management of Rosacea from the American Acne & Rosacea Society (AARS).The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Conventional and Novel Treatment Modalities in Rosacea.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2020
    Review
  18. Update on the Management of Rosacea from the American Acne & Rosacea Society (AARS).The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Topical Ivermectin: Data Supporting Dual Modes of Action in Rosacea.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kashif SiddiquiPAREXEL Access Consulting, PAREXEL International, 3rd Floor, DLF Tower E, Rajiv Gandi IT Park, Chandigarh, UT 160101 India.
Linda Stein GoldDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Medical Centre, Detroit, MI USA.
Japinder GillPAREXEL Access Consulting, PAREXEL International, 3rd Floor, DLF Tower E, Rajiv Gandi IT Park, Chandigarh, UT 160101 India.
PAREXEL International (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRosacea is a common chronic skin condition that manifests as recurrent inflammatory lesions. Long-term treatment is required to control symptoms and disease progression, with topical treatments being the first-line choice. Ivermectin 1 % cream is a new once-daily (QD) topical treatment for the inflammatory lesions of rosacea, and it is important to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ivermectin with other currently available topical treatments.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed from January 2011 to June 2015, with articles published prior to 2011 retrieved from a Cochrane review on rosacea. Randomized controlled trials of the topical treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea were identified from electronic databases and trial registers, and supplemented with data from clinical study reports. Mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs) were conducted to compare different treatments according to Bayesian methodology.

results57 studies were identified, with 19 providing data suitable for MTC. Ivermectin 1 % cream QD led to a significantly greater likelihood of success compared with azelaic acid 15 % gel twice-daily (BID) [relative risk (95 % credible interval): 1.25 (1.14-1.37)], and metronidazole 0.75 % cream BID [1.17 (1.08-1.29)] at 12 weeks. Ivermectin 1 % cream QD also demonstrated a significant reduction in inflammatory lesion count compared with azelaic acid 15 % gel BID [-8.04 (-12.69 to -3.43)] and metronidazole 0.75 % cream BID [-9.92 (-13.58 to -6.35)] at 12 weeks. Ivermectin 1 % cream QD led to a significantly lower risk of developing any AE or TRAE compared with azelaic acid 15 % gel BID [0.83 (0.71-0.97) and 0.47 (0.32-0.67), respectively].

conclusionsIvermectin 1 % cream QD appears to be a more effective topical treatment than other current options for the inflammatory lesions of rosacea, with at least an equivalent safety and tolerability profile, and could provide physicians and dermatologists with an alternative first-line treatment option.

Indexed as

IvermectinPapulopustularRosaceaTopical

Identifiers

PMID27504249
PMCPMC4956638
OpenAlexW2486730773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.