ReviewSpringerPlus2016
Helping patients to reduce tobacco consumption in oncology: a narrative review.
Review in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving referral rates for smoking cessation: A multifaceted intervention aimed at radiation oncologists.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Adherence to lifestyle recommendations among Norwegian cancer survivors and the impact of traditional and complementary medicine use: the Tromsø Study 2015-2016.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Brief intervention to enhance cessation of smokeless tobacco use in newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancers: A randomized controlled trial in patient-relative dyads.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Tobacco Smoking Behaviors in Cancer Survivors: The Mediation Effect of Personality and Emotional Intelligence.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Observational
- Reach and effectiveness of the NCI Cancer Moonshot-funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Cancer Chronic Pain Experience: A Narrative Review.Cancer management and research · 2022Review
- Lifestyle and Pain following Cancer: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Tobacco Use and Treatment among Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Assessment of Trends in Cigarette Smoking Cessation After Cancer Diagnosis Among US Adults, 2000 to 2017.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Smoking Behaviors in Survivors of Smoking-Related and Non-Smoking-Related Cancers.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Integration of Tobacco Treatment Services into Cancer Care at Stanford.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Patient-Physician Discussions on Lung Cancer Screening: A Missed Teachable Moment to Promote Smoking Cessation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020Article
- Increasing Smoking Cessation Adherence: Do We Need to Consider the Role of Executive Function and Rumination?Europe's journal of psychology · 2020Article
- Brief Intervention for Tobacco when Diagnosed with Oral Cancer (BITDOC): Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial studying efficacy of brief tobacco cessation intervention, Chhattisgarh, India.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2020Article
- Injured Self: Autobiographical Memory, Self-Concept, and Mental Health Risk in Breast Cancer Survivors.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Implementation of a comprehensive smoking cessation program in cancer care.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- Continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis: a longitudinal study of intentions and attempts to quit.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Article
- Article
- Smoking cessation attitudes and practices among cancer survivors - United States, 2015.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Article
- The role of emotions in cancer patients' decision-making.Ecancermedicalscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present overview focuses on evidence of smoking cessation approaches in oncology settings with the aim to provide health personnel a critical perspective on how to help their patients. This narrative review is structured in two main sections: the first one describes the psycho-cognitive variables involved in the decision to continue smoking after a cancer diagnosis and during the treatment; the second section relates methods and tools may be recommended, being evidence-based, to support smoking cessation in oncology settings. Active smoking increases not only susceptibility to common cancers in the general population, but also increases disease severity and comorbidities in cancer patients. Nowadays, scientific evidence has identified many strategies to give up smoking, but a lack of knowledge exists for treatment of nicotine dependence in the cancer population. Health personnel is often ambiguous when approaching the problem, while their contribution is essential in guiding patients towards healthier choices. We argue that smoking treatments for cancer patients deserve more attention and that clinical features, individual characteristics and needs of the patient should be assessed in order to increase the attempts success rate. Health personnel that daily work and interact with cancer patients and their caregivers have a fundamental role in the promotion of the health changing. For this reason, it is important that they have adequate knowledge and resources in order to support cancer patients to stop tobacco cigarette smoking and promoting and healthier lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.