Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27504126›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2016

Predictive criteria for MRI-based evaluation of response both during and after radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Jordy Mongula, Brigitte Slangen, Doenja Lambregts, Frans Bakers, Shekar Mahesh, Ludy Lutgens, Toon Van Gorp, Roy Vliegen, Roy Kruitwagen, Regina Beets-Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The use of PET/MRI in radiotherapy.Insights into imaging · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Metal artefacts in MRI-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jordy MongulaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht.
Brigitte SlangenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht.
Doenja LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre.
Frans BakersDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre.
Shekar MaheshDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre.
Ludy LutgensGROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht; MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht.
Toon Van GorpDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht.
Roy VliegenDepartment of Radiology, Heerlen Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Roy KruitwagenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht.
Regina Beets-TanGROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht; Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAtrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLMaastro Clinic · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor cervical carcinoma, the presence of persistent disease after radiotherapy (RT) is a significant predictor for survival. To date, no standard protocol is available to evaluate a response. This study was performed to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate presence of local residual disease during and after RT for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ib1-IVa cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-two patients were included. Patients underwent MRI before external beam RT, at final intracavitary brachytherapy (BCT) and 2-3 months after completion of RT. Two blinded radiologists (observer 1: experienced, observer 2: less experienced) scored the likelihood of residual tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated by means of (a) 'subjective' visual evaluation of T2 weighted MRI images, and (b) 'objective' visual evaluation of T2 weighted MRI images according to predefined imaging criteria.

resultsSeven patients had residual disease. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for 'subjective' visual assessment was 0.79/0.75 (observer 1/observer 2) after RT and 0.75/0.43 at final BCT. The combined 'objective' MRI criteria (isointense, nodular, and irregular) resulted in improved prediction of residual tumor (AUCs of 0.91/0.85 after RT). For the less experienced observer, the MRI criteria set significantly improved prediction of residual tumor compared to 'subjective' visual assessment. Observer dependency decreased, kappa of 0.41 compared to 0.84 for the MRI criteria set after RT.

conclusionCompared to 'subjective' visual assessment, predefined 'objective' MRI criteria increase diagnostic performance and decrease observer dependency for assessing residual tumor after RT in cervical cancer.

Indexed as

brachytherapycervical cancercervical carcinomamagnetic resonance imagingradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID27504126
PMCPMC4965503
OpenAlexW2487141562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.