ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2016
Predictive criteria for MRI-based evaluation of response both during and after radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The treatment response evaluation through the combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in cervical cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- The use of PET/MRI in radiotherapy.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI in Predicting the Tumor Response in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma Treated by Chemoradiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Tumor Size at Magnetic Resonance Imaging Association With Lymph Node Metastasis and Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Resectable Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Evaluation of Surgical Specimens.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2018Article
- Clinical and dosimetric consequences of imperfect applicator insertion in cervical cancer brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2018Article
- Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI) for response assessment after radiation therapy of cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.EJNMMI research · 2018Article
- Off-line magnetic resonance imaging navigation of cervix cancer brachytherapy in patients with risk factors for uterine perforation.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2017Article
- MicroRNA-145 sensitizes cervical cancer cells to low-dose irradiation by downregulating OCT4 expression.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Metal artefacts in MRI-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor cervical carcinoma, the presence of persistent disease after radiotherapy (RT) is a significant predictor for survival. To date, no standard protocol is available to evaluate a response. This study was performed to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate presence of local residual disease during and after RT for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ib1-IVa cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND
methodsForty-two patients were included. Patients underwent MRI before external beam RT, at final intracavitary brachytherapy (BCT) and 2-3 months after completion of RT. Two blinded radiologists (observer 1: experienced, observer 2: less experienced) scored the likelihood of residual tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated by means of (a) 'subjective' visual evaluation of T2 weighted MRI images, and (b) 'objective' visual evaluation of T2 weighted MRI images according to predefined imaging criteria.
resultsSeven patients had residual disease. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for 'subjective' visual assessment was 0.79/0.75 (observer 1/observer 2) after RT and 0.75/0.43 at final BCT. The combined 'objective' MRI criteria (isointense, nodular, and irregular) resulted in improved prediction of residual tumor (AUCs of 0.91/0.85 after RT). For the less experienced observer, the MRI criteria set significantly improved prediction of residual tumor compared to 'subjective' visual assessment. Observer dependency decreased, kappa of 0.41 compared to 0.84 for the MRI criteria set after RT.
conclusionCompared to 'subjective' visual assessment, predefined 'objective' MRI criteria increase diagnostic performance and decrease observer dependency for assessing residual tumor after RT in cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.