Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503995›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2016

Synthetic Biology of Natural Products.

Rainer Breitling, Eriko Takano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bioprospecting ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rainer BreitlingManchester Centre for Synthetic Biology of Fine and Speciality Chemicals (SYNBIOCHEM), Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Eriko TakanoManchester Centre for Synthetic Biology of Fine and Speciality Chemicals (SYNBIOCHEM), Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L027593/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017702/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity and natural modularity of their biosynthetic pathways has turned natural products into attractive, but challenging, targets for synthetic biology approaches. Here, we discuss the current state of the field, highlighting recent advances and remaining bottlenecks. Global genomic assessments of natural product biosynthetic capacities across large parts of microbial diversity provide a first survey of the available natural parts libraries and identify evolutionary design rules for further engineering. Methods for compound and pathway detection and characterization are developed increasingly on the basis of synthetic biology tools, contributing to an accelerated translation of genomic information into usable building blocks for pathway assembly. A wide range of methods is also becoming available for accessing ever larger parts of chemical space by rational diversification of natural products, guided by rapid progress in our understanding of the underlying biochemistry and enzymatic mechanisms. Enhanced genome assembly and editing tools, adapted to the needs of natural products research, facilitate the realization of ambitious engineering strategies, ranging from combinatorial library generation to high-throughput optimization of product titers. Together, these tools and concepts contribute to the emergence of a new generation of revitalized natural product research.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsSynthetic BiologyDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID27503995
PMCPMC5046697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.