Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503660›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Genetic characterization of cysteine-rich type-b avenin-like protein coding genes in common wheat.

X Y Chen, X Y Cao, Y J Zhang, S Islam, J J Zhang, R C Yang, J J Liu, G Y Li, R Appels, G Keeble-Gagnere and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The 10,000-Year Success Story of Wheat!Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New insights into the evolution of wheat avenin-like proteins in wild emmer wheat (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

X Y ChenCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A &F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.
X Y CaoCrop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Maize/Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement in North Yellow and Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, 250100, Jinan China.
Y J ZhangAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.
S IslamAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.
J J ZhangAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.
R C YangAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.
J J LiuCrop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Maize/Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement in North Yellow and Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, 250100, Jinan China.
G Y LiCrop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Maize/Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement in North Yellow and Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, 250100, Jinan China.
R AppelsAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.
G Keeble-GagnereAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.
W Q JiCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A &F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Z H HeNational Wheat Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhongguancun South St, Haidian District, Beijing, China 100081.
W J MaAustralia-China Joint Centre for Wheat Improvement, School of Veterinary &Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wheat avenin-like proteins (ALP) are considered atypical gluten constituents and have shown positive effects on dough properties revealed using a transgenic approach. However, to date the genetic architecture of ALP genes is unclear, making it impossible to be utilized in wheat breeding. In the current study, three genes of type-b ALPs were identified and mapped to chromosomes 7AS, 4AL and 7DS. The coding gene sequence of both TaALP-7A and TaALP-7D was 855 bp long, encoding two identical homologous 284 amino acid long proteins. TaALP-4A was 858 bp long, encoding a 285 amino acid protein variant. Three alleles were identified for TaALP-7A and four for TaALP-4A. TaALP-7A alleles were of two types: type-1, which includes TaALP-7A1 andTaALP-7A2, encodes mature proteins, while type-2, represented byTaALP-7A3, contains a stop codon in the coding region and thus does not encode a mature protein. Dough quality testing of 102 wheat cultivars established a highly significant association of the type-1 TaALP-7A allele with better wheat processing quality. This allelic effects were confirmed among a range of commercial wheat cultivars. Our research makes the ALP be the first of such genetic variation source that can be readily utilized in wheat breeding.

Indexed as

AllelesAmino Acid SequenceBreadChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantCysteineDNA, PlantGenes, PlantPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProlaminsTriticumCysteineDNA, PlantProlamins

Identifiers

PMID27503660
PMCPMC4977551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.