Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016
Phase 2, Dose-Ranging Study of Relebactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Subjects with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01506271 (A Phase II, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-7655 + Imipenem/Cilastatin Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin Alone in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection [cIAI]), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-7655 + Imipenem/Cilastatin Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin Alone in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection [cIAI]
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/CS/REL): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Friends or foes? Novel antimicrobials tackling MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: Results from phase II and III trials.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A randomized non-inferiority study comparing imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam with standard-of-care Gram-negative coverage in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Trial
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Trial
- Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Analysis Populations in the RESTORE-IMI 1 Phase 3 Trial of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam versus Colistin plus Imipenem-Cilastatin in Patients with Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Trial
- RESTORE-IMI 1: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Relebactam vs Colistin Plus Imipenem in Patients With Imipenem-nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Trial
- Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Relebactam, a Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor, Dosed in Combination with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Healthy Subjects.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Trial
- Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors Versus Best Available Therapy on the Mortality-Related Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sodium load of novel antibiotics: considerations for nephrologists and clinicians.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Antibiotic hybrids: A promising strategy to replenish the pipeline and combat antimicrobial resistance.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Exploring the Effectiveness of Imipenem/Relebactam in Patients with Antimicrobial-Resistant Hospital-Acquired Infections: Findings from Systematic Literature Reviews.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cost-minimizing alternative dosage regimens of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for patients with renal impairment: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: a systematic review.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Review
- The role of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: a comprehensive meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in infections caused by Difficult-to-Treat Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-world data in Greece.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Article
- Guidelines for Antibacterial Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections.Infection & chemotherapy · 2024Review
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relebactam (REL [MK-7655]) is a novel class A/C β-lactamase inhibitor intended for use with imipenem for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. REL restores imipenem activity against some resistant strains of Klebsiella and Pseudomonas In this multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial (NCT01506271), subjects who were ≥18 years of age with complicated intra-abdominal infection were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 250 mg REL, 125 mg REL, or placebo, each given intravenously (i.v.) with 500 mg imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) every 6 h (q6h) for 4 to 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of microbiologically evaluable (ME) subjects with a favorable clinical response at discontinuation of i.v. therapy (DCIV). A total of 351 subjects were randomized, 347 (99%) were treated, and 255 (73%) were ME at DCIV (55% male; mean age, 49 years). The most common diagnoses were complicated appendicitis (53%) and complicated cholecystitis (17%). Thirty-six subjects (13%) had imipenem-resistant Gram-negative infections at baseline. Both REL doses plus IMI were generally well tolerated and demonstrated safety profiles similar to that of IMI alone. Clinical response rates at DCIV were similar in subjects who received 250 mg REL plus IMI (96.3%) or 125 mg REL plus IMI (98.8%), and both were noninferior to IMI alone (95.2%; one-sided P < 0.001). The treatment groups were also similar with respect to clinical response at early and late follow-up and microbiological response at all visits. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations show that imipenem exposure at the proposed dose of 500 mg IMI with 250 mg REL q6h provides coverage of >90% of carbapenem-resistant bacterial strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.