ReviewImmunologic research2017
cDNA phage display for the discovery of theranostic autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis.
Review in Immunologic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral bacteriophages and their potential as adjunctive treatments for periodontitis: a narrative review.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Phage Display Technology in Biomarker Identification with Emphasis on Non-Cancerous Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Novel maternal autoantibodies in autism spectrum disorder: Implications for screening and diagnosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Antibodies of the immunoglobulin a isotype to novel antigens in early axial spondyloarthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Building Personalized Cancer Therapeutics through Multi-Omics Assays and Bacteriophage-Eukaryotic Cell Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Review
- Raising to the Challenge: Building a Federated Biobank to Accelerate Translational Research-The University Biobank Limburg.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
- Biomarkers and Pathogenic Mechanisms in Autoimmunity.Immunologic research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the world's most common autoimmune disease mainly characterized by a chronic inflammation of multiple synovial joints. Rheumatologists now have a whole range of treatment options including glucocorticoids (GCs), classical synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cs- and bDMARDS), resulting in a tremendous improvement in treatment outcomes for RA patients over the last two decades. Despite this progress, the choice of treatment regimen to achieve stable remission at the individual patient level still largely depends on trial and error. In this review, the need for novel theranostic markers that can predict a patient's response to methotrexate, the standard first-line csDMARD treatment, is discussed. Like in many autoimmune diseases, the majority of RA patients form a whole range of autoantibodies. We aim to find novel theranostic autoantibody markers using serological antigen selection, a high-throughput technique that uses cDNA phage display to identify novel antigen targets. We have constructed a barcoded cDNA phage display library from the synovial tissue of three RA patients by fusing cDNA products to the filamentous phage minor coat protein VI. This library contains a large proportion of full-length genes and gene fragments that are cloned in frame with the phage gene VI. By screening this library for antibody reactivity in serum samples of patients from the CareRA trial, which compared different intensive treatment strategies based on csDMARDs and a step-down GC schedule, our cDNA phage display library has great potential for the discovery of novel theranostic autoantibody biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.