Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503581›Full record

SynthesisThe pharmacogenomics journal2017

Irinotecan-induced toxicity pharmacogenetics: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

J M Campbell, M D Stephenson, E Bateman, M D J Peters, D M Keefe, J M Bowen

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prediction of mucositis risk secondary to cancer therapy: a systematic review of current evidence and call to action.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Resistance to TOP-1 Inhibitors: Good Old Drugs Still Can Surprise Us.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. All You Need to Know AboutJCO oncology practice · 2022
    Article
  12. The science of mucositis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microbiota-Host-Irinotecan Axis: A New Insight Toward Irinotecan Chemotherapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J M CampbellThe Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
M D StephensonThe Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
E BatemanSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
M D J PetersThe Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
D M KeefeSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J M BowenSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irinotecan chemotherapy toxicities can be severe, and may result in treatment delay, morbidity and in some rare cases death. This systematic review of systematic reviews synthesises all meta-analyses on biomarkers for irinotecan toxicity across all genetic models for Asians, Caucasians, low dose, medium/high dose and regimens with and without fluorouracil. False-positive findings are a problem in pharmacogenetics, increasing the importance of systematic reviews. Four systematic reviews that investigated the effect of the polymorphisms UGT1A1*6 and/or*28 on neutropenia or diarrhoea toxicity were included. Both UGT1A1*6 and *28 were reliably demonstrated to be risk factors for irinotecan-induced neutropenia, with tests for both polymorphisms potentially being particularly useful in Asian cancer patients. UGT1A1*6 and *28 were also related to diarrhoea toxicity; however, at low doses of irinotecan there was evidence that UGT1A1*28 was not. In synthesising the best available evidence, this umbrella systematic review provides a novel reference for clinicians applying personalised medicine and identifies important research gaps.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic VariantsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSystematic Reviews as TopicAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinDiarrheaGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGlucuronosyltransferaseHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansIrinotecanNeutropeniaOdds RatioAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID27503581
OpenAlexW2520046580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.